Clinical Outcome of Dental Implants Placed with High Insertion Torques (Up to 176 Ncm)

Khayat, P; Arnal, Hélène M.; Tourbah, Bahige; Sennerby, Lars

doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00351.x

Cited by 57 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 32 publications

(113 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[5][6][7][8][9][10] Other authors reported that high insertion torque value is one of the main causes of marginal bone resorption 11 or, however, not necessary. [12][13][14][15] The aim of this article is to review the recent international literature about low and high implant insertion torque investigating their effects on marginal bone loss and implant survival rate.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of High Insertion Torque Versus Low Insertion Torque on Marginal Bone Resorption and Implant Failure Rates

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of High Insertion Torque Versus Low Insertion Torque on Marginal Bone Resorption and Implant Failure Rates

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is however very little evidence to support this assumption. Khayat and colleagues compared two groups of implants that were placed at standard and high insertion torque values and found no differences in terms of implant success and bone loss. Similarly, de Santes and colleagues found no correlation between high insertion torque values (>50 Ncm) and crestal bone loss after 3 years.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A prospective study on ultra‐wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement

Hattingh

Hommez

Bruyn

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Although wide diameter implants are well documented, little is known about ultra‐wide diameter implants (>6 mm). This study evaluates the clinical outcome of ultra‐wide diameter implants, placed in molar extraction sockets. Materials and Methods Ultra‐wide diameter implants (7‐9 mm) were placed immediately after molar extraction in a 1‐stage protocol, without raising a flap or using any bone grafts. After 4 months, the implant was loaded with a single screw‐retained crown. Bone loss was evaluated using peri‐apical radiographs. Plaque and bleeding were recorded. Crown and papilla dimensions were measured and compared with the contra‐lateral tooth. Results Fifty‐one patients (36 male and 15 female), mean ages 61 years old, were treated with 26 implants in the maxilla and 25 implants in the mandible. The majority had a thick (#19) or medium (#31) biotype. After a mean‐follow‐up period of 23 months, the mean bone level was located 1.16 mm apical of the implant‐abutment junction (SD 0.42, range 0.00‐2.45) while the actual bone remodeling associated with socket healing resulted in a mean coronal movement of the bone level of 0.15 mm. The mean insertion torque was 116 Ncm (SD 53, range 10‐250). There were no differences in papilla height (P = .55), crown length (P = .32), zenith (P = .84), and bucco‐palatal dimensions (P = .38). There was a significant difference in the mesio‐distal dimension (P = .01). Mean probing depth was 2.59 mm at the implant and 2.23 mm at the contra‐lateral tooth (P = .001). There was significantly more plaque at the tooth compared to the implant (P = .01), but there was no significant difference in terms of bleeding on probing (P = .08). Patient satisfaction was high with 72.5% of the patients experiencing no problems at all. Conclusions Ultra‐wide diameter implants have a predictable outcome, demonstrating very little bone loss. Papilla and crown dimensions were comparable to the contra‐lateral natural tooth.

show abstract

“…Despite the ability to accurately detect soft (type 4) bone via tactile feedback during osteotomy preparation, the soft bone surgical protocol was used in 45 implant sites with reportedly greater bone density. Placing a tapered implant into a slightly underprepared osteotomy has been advocated to improve primary stability in soft bone, but the technique may lead to high compression forces and elevated insertion torque values in bone with greater density . Concerns have been raised that such cases may impair local microcirculation, cause osteocyte necrosis, and result in bone resorption .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of Trabecular Metal‐Enhanced Titanium Dental Implants Placed in Routine Dental Practices: 1‐Year Interim Report From the Development Period (2010 to 2011)

Schlee¹,

Pradíes

Mehmke³

et al. 2014

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Clinical Outcome of Dental Implants Placed with High Insertion Torques (Up to 176 Ncm)

Abstract: The use of high insertion torques (up to 176 Ncm) did not prevent osseointegration. Marginal bone levels in the control and experimental groups were similar both at the time of loading and 1 year later.

Cited by 57 publications

References 32 publications

The Effects of High Insertion Torque Versus Low Insertion Torque on Marginal Bone Resorption and Implant Failure Rates

The Effects of High Insertion Torque Versus Low Insertion Torque on Marginal Bone Resorption and Implant Failure Rates

A prospective study on ultra‐wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement

Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of Trabecular Metal‐Enhanced Titanium Dental Implants Placed in Routine Dental Practices: 1‐Year Interim Report From the Development Period (2010 to 2011)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About