2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcome in patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer and germline BRCA1/2-mutation – real life data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in line with a number of previous studies. Studies with limited follow-up periods showed improved PFS and OS–with comparable periods without progression and time till death as seen in our study–for BRCA1- associated EOC patients [ 23 ], BRCA2- associated patients [ 23 , 30 ], or combined BRCA1/2 cohorts [ 10 , 22 , 24 26 ]. Studies with long-term periods of follow-up showed that improved overall survival seems to be mainly driven by the first five years after diagnosis, with no benefit for those surviving that first period [ 31 , 33 , 36 ], or even worse OS afterwards [ 32 ], as observed in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are in line with a number of previous studies. Studies with limited follow-up periods showed improved PFS and OS–with comparable periods without progression and time till death as seen in our study–for BRCA1- associated EOC patients [ 23 ], BRCA2- associated patients [ 23 , 30 ], or combined BRCA1/2 cohorts [ 10 , 22 , 24 26 ]. Studies with long-term periods of follow-up showed that improved overall survival seems to be mainly driven by the first five years after diagnosis, with no benefit for those surviving that first period [ 31 , 33 , 36 ], or even worse OS afterwards [ 32 ], as observed in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In a previous study the only independent prognostic factor for survival in BRCA1/2 gPV carriers was the extent of debulking at primary surgery, with better survival for patients without macroscopic disease [ 10 ]. Recently, Ataseven et al confirmed that complete macroscopic tumor resection is a strong prognostic factor in patients with EOC, regardless of BRCA status [ 26 ]. In the current study we did adjust for debulking surgery (yes/no), but the amount of residual disease may be more important in this respect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The missing report of BRCA status due to study utilizing a retrospective cohort is an empirical limitation. However, BRCA mutation status has been shown not to be associated with improved surgical outcome by the studies of Dimitrova et al [41] and Ataseven et al [42] Various institutions attempted an optimal debulking signature before, successfully identifying prognostic biomarkers for total macroscopic clearance [43]. The studies of Sood et al [17], Riester et al [14], and Tothill et al [24] show overlaps with our results, though both Tothill and Riester included all FIGO stages.…”
Section: Results Strengths and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In a recently published study by Ataseven et al, these findings were largely confirmed in a great population of 1221 patients with pOC disease. 26 Similarly to our findings, the BRCAmut cohort FIG. 4 PFS after surgery for first OC recurrence between the BRCAmut and BRCAwt cohorts showed higher rates of complete tumor resection compared with their BRCAwt counterparts but did not reach statistical significance, and surgical complexity was not significantly different between both groups.…”
Section: Results In the Context Of Published Literaturesupporting
confidence: 85%