2023
DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Position Statement: 2022 update to the safe handling of monoclonal antibodies in healthcare settings

Abstract: AimThe aims were to (a) review the scientific literature on occupational risk, including exposure mechanisms and risk assessment, with regards to handling monoclonal antibodies (mABs) in healthcare settings; and (b) update the recommendations in the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA) safe handling of monoclonal antibodies in healthcare settings position statement, published in 2013.MethodsA literature search was conducted between April 24, 2022, and July 3, 2022, to identify evidence relating to occ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, one study investigating the instability of antibodies during aerosolization of lung mucosa in mice found the development of aggregates, which led to pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic effects [16]. The Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Position Statement [17] also reviews the safe handling of monoclonal antibodies in the health care setting where distinct exposure mechanisms, dermal, mucosal, inhalation, and oral, were discussed with regard to health risk, e.g., dermatitis and skin sensitization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one study investigating the instability of antibodies during aerosolization of lung mucosa in mice found the development of aggregates, which led to pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic effects [16]. The Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Position Statement [17] also reviews the safe handling of monoclonal antibodies in the health care setting where distinct exposure mechanisms, dermal, mucosal, inhalation, and oral, were discussed with regard to health risk, e.g., dermatitis and skin sensitization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%