2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical next generation sequencing in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: Diagnostic relevance of data re-analysis and variants re-interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent decade, the development and greater availability of advanced genomic methods have led to a major shift towards etiological diagnostics of epilepsy. The number of causal genes is increasing daily, which has led to an increase in diagnostic yield [ 8 ]. The overall yield of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants from our cohort was 23.1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the recent decade, the development and greater availability of advanced genomic methods have led to a major shift towards etiological diagnostics of epilepsy. The number of causal genes is increasing daily, which has led to an increase in diagnostic yield [ 8 ]. The overall yield of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants from our cohort was 23.1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salinas and colleagues detected pathogenic variants initially in 38% of subjects with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. However, after an average time of 29 months, 25% of the subjects without a genetic diagnosis were re-categorized and diagnosed [ 8 ]. Finally, patients were not monitored throughout the study, and we cannot access data from the diagnostic test to monitor the impact on therapeutic management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 47 papers were published after the seminal paper in 2015 which described seven epileptic patients with SLC6A1 variants ( Carvill et al, 2015 ). Of the 47 clinically relevant papers, two were focused on attention deficit disorder ( Merriman et al, 2015 ; Yuan et al, 2017 , p1), two researched a connection with alcoholism ( Adkins et al, 2015 ; Enoch et al, 2016 ), one found SLC6A1 variants related to Alzheimer’s disease ( Zhu et al, 2020 ), one focused on connections to anxiety ( Sarris et al, 2020 ), three were focused on somatic mutations in malignant tumors ( Eshragh et al, 2017 ; Chen et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2022 , p1), one focused on dystonia ( Zech et al, 2017 ), one included multiple gene deletions ( Dikow et al, 2014 ; Yuan et al, 2020 ), four reported SLC6A1 variants associated with schizophrenia ( Frankle et al, 2015 ; Hoftman et al, 2015 ; Zhao et al, 2016 ; Rees et al, 2020 ), three focused on other similar mental health disorders ( Demarest et al, 2019 ; Ahring et al, 2022 ; Knight et al, 2022 ), two described genetic testing technologies ( Schijns et al, 2020 ; Salinas et al, 2021 ), and two described general developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) without specific description of patients with SLC6A1 mutation ( Schousboe et al, 2004 ; Guillen-Guio et al, 2018 ; Galer et al, 2020 ; Salinas et al, 2021 ). Only 25 papers included clinical description of patients with neurodevelopmental symptoms and DEEs, with a likely overlap of a few patients between these papers ( Supplementary Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…patiënten (Halfmeyer et al, 2022;Salinas et al, 2021), bijvoorbeeld in genen die pas recent aan fenotypes gekoppeld zijn en die ten tijde van het initiële onderzoek nog geen bekende ziektegenen waren.…”
Section: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoekunclassified