2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-64142-7.00045-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical neurophysiology of pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 358 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess an individual's sensitivity to pain, standardized painful stimuli that activate the A and C fibers in the human body are applied to the surface of the skin. A variety of techniques, including thermal, laser, mechanical (e.g., flat tip probes), or electrical stimulation are commonly used to evoke pain responses in the subject's brain (Iannetti et al, 2013;Oh et al, 2015;Wulf et al, 2017;Albu and Meagher, 2019;Lefaucheur, 2019). The extent of the response strongly correlates with how ''painful'' the individual subjectively rates the applied stimulus; a good correlation between a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score communicated by the subject and the amplitude of the noxious contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPS) can usually be detected (Roberts et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess an individual's sensitivity to pain, standardized painful stimuli that activate the A and C fibers in the human body are applied to the surface of the skin. A variety of techniques, including thermal, laser, mechanical (e.g., flat tip probes), or electrical stimulation are commonly used to evoke pain responses in the subject's brain (Iannetti et al, 2013;Oh et al, 2015;Wulf et al, 2017;Albu and Meagher, 2019;Lefaucheur, 2019). The extent of the response strongly correlates with how ''painful'' the individual subjectively rates the applied stimulus; a good correlation between a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score communicated by the subject and the amplitude of the noxious contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPS) can usually be detected (Roberts et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser, contact-heat, and intraepidermal electrical stimulation are the three main types of stimuli that can be used reliably. Thermal modalities primarily investigate small-diameter Að* fiber dysfunction (rather than C-fibers), and the central lesions involving the spinothalamic tract ( 44 ). Intraepidermal electrical stimulation preferentially activates large-diameter AB fibers rather than small-diameter Að* or C fibers ( 44 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may be of large amplitude, but are extremely variable in both amplitude and latency (for a review see Lefaucheur, 2019). In addition, most of these late potentials have similar waveshapes to artefacts caused by muscular potentials which are often not automatically rejected because they have similar amplitudes as the genuine signal components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%