2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-019-01183-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Management of Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions with Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
23
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite receiving the same dose [and having similar areas under the concentration-time curve (AUCs)], the likelihood of severe bleeding was significantly increased in patients who had higher C min and lower C max values because of different dosing regimens (edoxaban 30 mg twice daily vs. edoxaban 60 mg once daily) [19]. In contrast, major and non-major bleeding episodes in patients taking rivaroxaban were more frequent in those who had a higher C max or AUC, whereas bleeding events during apixaban correlated better with AUC or C min than with C max [14,20,21]. Although evidence suggests that C min is the value that best predicts edoxaban toxicity, trials investigating this relationship are rare.…”
Section: Importance Of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (Doac) Exposure For mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite receiving the same dose [and having similar areas under the concentration-time curve (AUCs)], the likelihood of severe bleeding was significantly increased in patients who had higher C min and lower C max values because of different dosing regimens (edoxaban 30 mg twice daily vs. edoxaban 60 mg once daily) [19]. In contrast, major and non-major bleeding episodes in patients taking rivaroxaban were more frequent in those who had a higher C max or AUC, whereas bleeding events during apixaban correlated better with AUC or C min than with C max [14,20,21]. Although evidence suggests that C min is the value that best predicts edoxaban toxicity, trials investigating this relationship are rare.…”
Section: Importance Of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (Doac) Exposure For mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…При этом ривароксабан и апиксабан являются ингибиторами фактора Xa, а дабигатран -ингибитором фактора IIa (тромбина) Гастроэнтерология Дискуссии [2]. Ривароксабан и апиксабан метаболизируются и выводятся из организма преимущественно при участии изофермента цитохрома Р-450 CYP3A4 и транспортного белка P-гликопротеина (P-gp) [3]. В метаболизме дабигатрана ферменты системы цитохрома Р-450 не задействованы, поэтому основная роль в выведении дабигатрана из организма отводится транспортному белку P-gp [3].…”
Section: влияние кларитромицина на плазменные концентрации поакunclassified
“…Ривароксабан и апиксабан метаболизируются и выводятся из организма преимущественно при участии изофермента цитохрома Р-450 CYP3A4 и транспортного белка P-гликопротеина (P-gp) [3]. В метаболизме дабигатрана ферменты системы цитохрома Р-450 не задействованы, поэтому основная роль в выведении дабигатрана из организма отводится транспортному белку P-gp [3]. Кларитромицин является ингибитором CYP3A4 и P-gp, вследствие чего при его совместном применении с ПОАК концентрации последних в плазме крови повышаются, что сопровождается усилением антикоагулянтного эффекта [3].…”
Section: влияние кларитромицина на плазменные концентрации поакunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of the approved DOACs are substrates of P-glycoprotein, an important mediator of drug interactions. In addition, both rivaroxaban and apixaban-the two commonly used DOACs-are dependent on the cytochrome P450 enzyme [8]. Thus, concomitant use of medications that, for example, inhibit both the P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 systems could increase the plasma level of a DOAC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%