2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01532.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical management of deliberate self-harm in young people: the need for evidence-based approaches to reduce repetition

Abstract: The evidence base for treatments designed to reduce the repetition of self-harm in adolescents and young adults is very limited. Expensive interventions such as intensive aftercare offer no clear benefit over routine aftercare. Given that deliberate self-harm among young people is a common clinical problem further good quality treatment studies are warranted. Careful consideration should be given to process evaluation to determine which individual components of any given intervention are effective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of a low level of professional help‐seeking in the present study is a cause for concern, as the assessment of adolescents who self‐harm, followed by effective intervention, is crucial to help reduce the repetition of self‐harm (Burns et al . ). It is of note that approximately half of the young people in this study who self‐harmed had done so more than once, and this repetition might have been influenced by the lack of mental health assessment and intervention following the first episode of self‐harm (Bergen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The identification of a low level of professional help‐seeking in the present study is a cause for concern, as the assessment of adolescents who self‐harm, followed by effective intervention, is crucial to help reduce the repetition of self‐harm (Burns et al . ). It is of note that approximately half of the young people in this study who self‐harmed had done so more than once, and this repetition might have been influenced by the lack of mental health assessment and intervention following the first episode of self‐harm (Bergen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Self-harm (any act of self-poisoning or self-injury irrespective of motivation or intent) affects approximately one in every five to ten adolescents and is indicative of psychological distress, often repetitive, and strongly associated with future suicide risk (Burns, Dudley, Hazell, & Patton, 2005;Chan et al, 2016;Doyle, Treacy, & Sheridan, 2015;Madge et al, 2008). Selfharm is a common reason for young people presenting to general hospital and specialist mental health services (Shanmugavadivel, Sands, & Wood, 2014;Stafford, Hutchby, Karim, & O'Reilly, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for this might be that we are not prioritising the types of activities that are likely to reduce suicide risk. Although much is known about the epidemiology of suicide, there has, to date, been relatively little intervention research in the field of suicide prevention, 10 in particular among youth, 11,12 and including in Australia. We previously conducted a study examining the extent and nature of suicide-prevention research being conducted in Australia during the period 1999-2006 and found that although young people were a highly researched group in terms of published articles, most studies were epidemiological in nature reporting on rates of, and risk factors for, suicide, as opposed to studies reporting on the effectiveness of individual interventions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%