2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical malnutrition predictive model among gynecologic cancer patients prior to elective operation: A cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BMI and weight were unable to detect malnutrition among GC patients when used as the sole nutritional variable. This finding was consistent with previous studies in which BMI alone was limited in reflecting nutritional status and thus not accurate in indicating malnutrition in GC patients [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Underestimation of BMI in detecting malnutrition might be caused by body fluid imbalance, which includes the presence of ascites or oedema caused by a decrease in albumin [ 15 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…BMI and weight were unable to detect malnutrition among GC patients when used as the sole nutritional variable. This finding was consistent with previous studies in which BMI alone was limited in reflecting nutritional status and thus not accurate in indicating malnutrition in GC patients [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Underestimation of BMI in detecting malnutrition might be caused by body fluid imbalance, which includes the presence of ascites or oedema caused by a decrease in albumin [ 15 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The PG-SGA provides a score (higher score indicates a higher risk of malnutrition) and categorizes patients into three distinct classes of nutritional status: A, well-nourished; B, suspected malnutrition or moderately malnourished; and C, severely malnourished. In this analysis, patients were categorized into two groups: wellnourished (PG-SGA score 0-3) and malnourished (PG-SGA score ≥4) (15,(26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Nutritional Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trained nutrition support team used the Chinese version of PG-SGA in the ward to investigate the nutritional status of the patients included in this study prior to PORT/CRT. During this research, the study subjects were classified into two groups based on previous studies (20,21): the well-nourished group containing individuals with a PG-SGA score between 1 and 3 and the malnourished group containing individuals with a PG-SGA score ≥ 4.…”
Section: Treatment Work-up and Nutritional Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%