Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions

Dijken, Jan W.V. van; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg, Karin; Lindberg, A.

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.005

Cited by 112 publications

(98 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, we have been performing clinical trials of resin composite restorations in NCCLs over as long a period of time as possible [28,31,32]. Recently, several long-term (7 years or more) clinical trials of NCCLs have been published [33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. All of them demonstrated that adhesive bonds continuously degraded with wide variation and that this bond degradation was independent of the adhesion strategy used.…”

Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In order to get more insight into this clinical problem, we first performed a series of laboratory studies on clinical placement techniques of cervical resin composite restorations by means of microleakage tests [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and then we have been conducting clinical trials [27][28][29][30][31][32]. The aim of this article is to discuss the challenges we faced in the clinical placement and evaluation of cervical resin composite restorations as they relate to clinical studies, especially recently published, long-term clinical trials [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Challenges to the clinical placement and evaluation of adhesively-bonded, cervical composite restorations

Kubo

Yokota

et al. 2013

Dental Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The incidence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) has been increasing.The clinical performance of resin composites in NCCLS was previously unsatisfactory due to their non-retentive forms and margins lying on dentin. In order to address this problem, a lot of effort has been put into developing new dentin adhesives and restorative techniques. This article discusses these challenges and the criteria used for evaluating clinical performance as they relate to clinical studies, especially long-term clinical trials. Polymerization contraction, thermal changes and occlusal forces generate debonding stresses at adhesive interfaces.Methods: In laboratory studies, we have investigated how these stresses can be relieved by various restorative techniques and how bond strength and durability can be enhanced. Lesion forms, restorative techniques, adhesives (adhesive strategies, bond strengths, bond durability, and the relationship between enamel and dentin bond strengths) were found to have a complex relationship with microleakage. With regard to some restorative techniques, only several short-term clinical studies were available.

show abstract

Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges to the clinical placement and evaluation of adhesively-bonded, cervical composite restorations

Kubo

Yokota

et al. 2013

Dental Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, the prospective studies may not reflect the real-life of restorations in general dental practice or daily living since they include many biases such as operator-and patient-related factors [1,7,29,30,35]. This is supported by the fact that secondary caries rarely occurred in the prospective cohort studies [5,9,[12][13][14]19,[21][22][23][24][25] though it is the principal reason for failure of restorations in daily general practice [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Retrospective studies are less defined than prospective ones, however, certain advantages of the retrospective studies are that many restorations can be examined in a relatively short time and more clinicians and patients are involved [30,35].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 83%

Longevity of resin composite restorations

2014

Dental Abstracts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In daily practice, an evidence-based approach is becoming more expected of dentist.However, only outcomes obtained from clinical studies are accepted as evidence. Although many clinical trials have been performed, most of them are short-term studies, whereas long-term studies are likely to provide more reliable evidence. In this article, prospective studies and retrospective longitudinal clinical studies on resin composite restorations were systematically searched with PubMed for literature in English and with Japana Centra Revuo Medicina (Ichushi Web) for articles in Japanese. Finally, 21 long-term (8 years or more) prospective studies and nine retrospective studies with survival analysis were selected and reviewed from more than 561 papers. The overall findings suggest that at least 60% of resin composite restorations will last more than 10 years when proper materials are applied correctly. Patient-, operator-, material-and tooth-related factors may have an influence on the survival of resin composite restorations. Appropriate maintenance policies based on MI concepts are claimed to enhance the longevity of resin composite restorations.

show abstract

“…There were only two studies which followed up the restorations for 5 and 7 years, respectively (Kubo et al, 2006;Peumans et al, 2005a). Recently, a study was published showing the performance of 7 adhesive systems over a period of 13 years (Van Dijken et al, 2006); but only retention loss was reported. This study has shown that Class V restorations placed with adhesive systems that demonstrate a retention loss of around 10-20% within the first five years of service may exhibit a sharp increase in retention loss in the years thereafter (up to 50-60%).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Marginal adaptation in vitro and clinical outcome of Class V restorations

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVES: We examined the correlation between the quantitative margin analysis of two laboratory test methods (Berlin, Zurich) and the clinical outcome in Class V restorations. METHODS: Prospective clinical studies with an observation period of at least 18 months were searched in the literature, for which laboratory data were also available. The clinical outcome variables were retention loss, marginal discoloration, detectable margins and secondary caries. Forty-four clinical studies matched the inclusion criteria, including 34 adhesive systems for which laboratory data were also present. For both laboratory test methods and the clinical studies, an index was formulated to better compare the in vitro and in vivo results. Linear mixed models which included a random study effect were calculated. As most clinical data were available for 12 and 24 months, the main analysis was restricted to these recall intervals. RESULTS: The comparative analysis revealed a weak correlation between the clinical index and both in vitro indices. The correlation was statistically significant for the Berlin method but not for the Zurich method and only present if studies were compared which used the same composite in the in vitro and in vivo study. When defining specific cut-off values, the prognosis for the good clinical performance of an adhesive system based on in vitro results was 78% (Berlin) or 100% (Zurich). For poor performance it was 67% and 60%, respectively. No correlation was found between both in vitro methods. SIGNIFICANCE: The surrogate parameter "marginal adaptation" of restorations placed in extracted teeth has a mediocre value to predict the clinical performance of an adhesive system in cervical cavities. The composite is an important factor for a successful prediction. The comparison between in vitro/in vivo is sometimes hampered by the great variability of clinical results on the same adhesive system. When defining specific cut-off values, the prognosis for the good clinical performance of an AS based on in vitro results was 78 % (Berlin method) or 100% (Zurich method). For poor performance it was 67% or 60%, respectively.No correlation was found between both in vitro methods.

show abstract

Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions

Cited by 112 publications

References 14 publications

Challenges to the clinical placement and evaluation of adhesively-bonded, cervical composite restorations

Challenges to the clinical placement and evaluation of adhesively-bonded, cervical composite restorations

Longevity of resin composite restorations

Marginal adaptation in vitro and clinical outcome of Class V restorations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About