2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical, laboratory and imaging predictors for critical illness and mortality in patients with COVID-19: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: IntroductionWith the threat of a worldwide pandemic of COVID-19, it is important to identify the prognostic factors for critical conditions among patients with non-critical COVID-19. Prognostic factors and models may assist front-line clinicians in rapid identification of high-risk patients, early management of modifiable factors, appropriate triaging and optimising the use of limited healthcare resources. We aim to systematically assess the clinical, laboratory and imaging predictors as well as prediction mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an urgent need to identify patients at higher risk of intubation and death, since de novo ARF plays a central role in Covid-19, being responsible for morbidity and mortality [4,42,43]. In addition, defining the best setting where to allocate patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia could play a central role in this emergency era for health care resources worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an urgent need to identify patients at higher risk of intubation and death, since de novo ARF plays a central role in Covid-19, being responsible for morbidity and mortality [4,42,43]. In addition, defining the best setting where to allocate patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia could play a central role in this emergency era for health care resources worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, many studies have been conducted to select the most significant variables for predicting COVID-19 mortality from a clinical perspective. In these studies, the top 10 predictors or effective factors for the mortality of COVID-19 patients are advanced age (older age) [2-6, 55, 63, 65, 67], longer LOS [1-3, 6, 65], mechanical ventilation [4,7,55,[61][62][63], fever [1,2,6,55,61,62,65], decreased SPO 2 (low oxygen saturation) [35,49,51,60], elevated interlukin-6 [4,5,55,[61][62][63][64][65], high blood pressure [2, 4-6, 8, 55, 63, 64], leukocytosis [1,4,7,8,61,63,64], increased BUN [4,5,55,[61][62][63][64][65], cardiovascular [1, 2, 4-6, 8, 55, 61-65], and COPD [4,6,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Assigning weights to all the linkages to start the algorithm (2) Using the inputs and linkages for the activation rate of hidden nodes (3) Using the activation rate of hidden nodes and linkages to output, obtaining the activation rate of output nodes (4) Obtaining the error rate at the output node and cascading down the error to hidden nodes (5) Recalibrating the weights between the hidden nodes and the input nodes (6) Repeating the process till the convergence (7) Scoring the activation rate of the output nodes by the final linkage weights SVM: The SVM classifier, based on the strategy of the maximal margin classifier, looks for the hyperplane that maximizes the border between those two classes with linear separation of two classes. For example, in Figure 2, the SVM classifier finds the best hyperplane (the red line) to maximize the distance between the nearest data samples of class A and class B [48].…”
Section: Ga Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The studies that are most closely related to our work focus on the development and assessment of prognostic models of mortality among COVID-19 infected patients [17] , [18] and the identification of prognostic factors for severity and mortality in patients infected with COVID-19. [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] …”
Section: The 24h Models Were Found To Perform Significantly Better Than the 0h Models (Improved Auroc Of 0·02) But Since It Is Only A Smamentioning
confidence: 99%