Clinical Investigations Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy as the boost in combination with external beam irradiation in base of tongue cancer. Long-term results from a uniform clinical series
Abstract:PurposeTo evaluate long time outcome with regard to local tumour control, side effects and quality of life of combined pulsed dose rate (PDR) boost and hyperfractionated accelerated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for primary base of tongue (BOT) cancers.Material and methodsBetween 1994 and 2007, the number of 83 patients were treated with primary T1-T4 BOT cancers. Seven patients (8%) were T1-2N0 (AJCC stage I-II) and 76 (92%) patients were T1-2N+ or T3-4N0-2 (AJCC stage III-IV). The mean estimated primary … Show more
“…It has also been postulated that pulsing every second or third hour would be equivalent [12]. Long term clinical outcome data with PDR 24 pulses per day and 12 pulses per day are now available [13][14][15][16]. In contrast, when moving from LDR to HDR the total treatment dose has to be reduced depending on the dose per fraction.…”
Section: General Aspects Of Treatment Planning: Dose and Fractionationmentioning
The Head and Neck Working Group of the GEC-ESTRO (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie - European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) published in 2009 the consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy in head & neck cancers. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery was also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the developments in the field, these recommendations needed to be updated to reflect up-to-date knowledge. The present update does not repeat basic knowledge which was published in the first recommendation but covers in a general part developments in (1) dose and fractionation, (2) aspects of treatment selection for brachytherapy alone versus combined BT+EBRT and (3) quality assurance issues. Detailed expert committee opinion intends to help the clinical practice in lip-, oral cavity-, oropharynx-, nasopharynx-, and superficial cancers. Different aspects of adjuvant treatment techniques and their results are discussed, as well the possibilities of salvage brachytherapy applications.
“…It has also been postulated that pulsing every second or third hour would be equivalent [12]. Long term clinical outcome data with PDR 24 pulses per day and 12 pulses per day are now available [13][14][15][16]. In contrast, when moving from LDR to HDR the total treatment dose has to be reduced depending on the dose per fraction.…”
Section: General Aspects Of Treatment Planning: Dose and Fractionationmentioning
The Head and Neck Working Group of the GEC-ESTRO (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie - European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) published in 2009 the consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy in head & neck cancers. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery was also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the developments in the field, these recommendations needed to be updated to reflect up-to-date knowledge. The present update does not repeat basic knowledge which was published in the first recommendation but covers in a general part developments in (1) dose and fractionation, (2) aspects of treatment selection for brachytherapy alone versus combined BT+EBRT and (3) quality assurance issues. Detailed expert committee opinion intends to help the clinical practice in lip-, oral cavity-, oropharynx-, nasopharynx-, and superficial cancers. Different aspects of adjuvant treatment techniques and their results are discussed, as well the possibilities of salvage brachytherapy applications.
“…Brachytherapy is increasingly accepted as an alternative treatment for inoperable head and neck malignant neoplasms. High-dose brachytherapy and iridium-192 ( 192 Ir) IBT were used for tongue squamous cell carcinoma [28][29][30]. To the best of our knowledge, no research on brachytherapy or 125 I was reported in ACC of the BOT.…”
Purpose: The present study retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy for treatment of primary locally advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the base of tongue (BOT).Material and methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of data of 19 patients with ACC, who were treated with iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy between March 2008 and April 2018. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control (LC), and radiation-related toxicities were determined. Factors affecting the outcomes were evaluated.Results: Six males and 13 females were included in our study, with a median follow-up time of 35 months. 3-and 5-year OS rates were 71.5% and 47.6%, respectively. 3-and 5-year LC rates were 88.5% and 34.5%, respectively. 3-and 5-year DFS rates were 54.7% and 21.9%, respectively. A significant difference was observed in patients with or without brain metastases for OS rate. No severe acute toxicity was observed, while severe late toxicity was observed in one patient.Conclusions: The results suggest that iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy is an effective and safe option for the treatment of primary locally advanced ACC of the base of the tongue, with reasonably satisfactory LC and OS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.