WISC-IV Clinical Use and Interpretation 2005
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012564931-5/50003-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Interpretation of the WISC-IV FSIQ and GAI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The General Ability Index is derived from VCI and PRI without including WMI and PSI, which are likely to be low in children with neurological disorders, such as high-functioning autism. For children with neurocognitive deficits, the General Ability Index may be a more valid measure of intelligence than FSIQ (Fiorello et al, 2002;Saklofske, Prifitera, Weiss, Rolfhus, & Zhu, 2005;Weiss, Saklofske, Prifitera, Chen, & Hildebrand, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The General Ability Index is derived from VCI and PRI without including WMI and PSI, which are likely to be low in children with neurological disorders, such as high-functioning autism. For children with neurocognitive deficits, the General Ability Index may be a more valid measure of intelligence than FSIQ (Fiorello et al, 2002;Saklofske, Prifitera, Weiss, Rolfhus, & Zhu, 2005;Weiss, Saklofske, Prifitera, Chen, & Hildebrand, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a measure of GI can be obtained without using the WMI subtests (Saklofske, Prifitera, Weiss, Rolfhus, & Zhu, 2005), referring to six subtests with high loadings on g factor and only related to two different general intelligence indexes (i.e., VCI and PRI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a detailed discussion of the GAI is beyond the scope of this article. The reader who wishes to learn more about the GAI is referred to Prifitera, Weiss, and Saklofske (1998) and Saklofske et al (2005). The administration times reported above do not include the associated tasks of scoring and interpreting the scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All protocols were checked by at least two examiners to insure scoring accuracy. In addition to obtaining administration time estimates for the WISC-IV subtests and composites, time requirements of eight short forms and the General Ability Index (GAI; Saklofske, Rolfhus, Prifitera, Zhu, & Weiss, 2005) were also calculated. The two-subtest and three-subtest combinations were selected because they have excellent validity coefficients (Sattler & Dumont, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%