Abstract:The history of phage therapy started with its first clinical application in 1919 and continues its development to this day. Phages continue to lack any market approval in Western medicine as a recognized drug, but are increasingly used as an experimental therapy for the compassionate treatment of patients experiencing antibiotic failure. The few formal experimental phage clinical trials that have been completed to date have produced inconclusive results on the efficacy of phage therapy, which contradicts the m… Show more
“…Clinical improvement was observed in 92% of bacteriophages-treated patients. Bacteria were eliminated from the urine in 84% of patients (Perepanova et al 1995). Unfortunately, clinical trials conducted in Eastern Europe are poorly documented, and some reports are available in Russian or Georgian only (Chanishvili et al 2001).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Bacteriophagesmentioning
Summary
Bacteriophages, highly prevalent in all environments, have found their use in medicine as an alternative or complement to antibiotics. The therapeutic use of bacteriophages was particularly popular in the 1920s and 1930s, until the discovery and introduction of antibiotics. Due to the dynamic growth of antibiotic resistance among bacterial strains, numerous international institutions (such as the FDA) have declared the search for novel treatment modalities to be of the highest priority. To date, bacteriophage therapy has not been registered for general use in Western countries. The regulation of biological medicinal products (within medicinal product regulation) does not contain a specific documentation frame for bacteriophages (only for vaccines, blood derived products, etc.) which, as active substances, need to meet specific requirements. Recently, the FDA allowed bacteriophage therapy to be used in the United States, via the Emergency Investigational New Drug scheme; clinical trials to compare the safety and efficacy of bacteriophage therapy are also permitted. To date, several therapeutic products of this type have made it to phase I or II; some clinical programmes have also been completed. This article cites numerous animal model studies and registered clinical trials, showing the safety and effectiveness of bacteriophage therapy, including infections caused by bacterial strains resistant to antibiotic treatment.
“…Clinical improvement was observed in 92% of bacteriophages-treated patients. Bacteria were eliminated from the urine in 84% of patients (Perepanova et al 1995). Unfortunately, clinical trials conducted in Eastern Europe are poorly documented, and some reports are available in Russian or Georgian only (Chanishvili et al 2001).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Bacteriophagesmentioning
Summary
Bacteriophages, highly prevalent in all environments, have found their use in medicine as an alternative or complement to antibiotics. The therapeutic use of bacteriophages was particularly popular in the 1920s and 1930s, until the discovery and introduction of antibiotics. Due to the dynamic growth of antibiotic resistance among bacterial strains, numerous international institutions (such as the FDA) have declared the search for novel treatment modalities to be of the highest priority. To date, bacteriophage therapy has not been registered for general use in Western countries. The regulation of biological medicinal products (within medicinal product regulation) does not contain a specific documentation frame for bacteriophages (only for vaccines, blood derived products, etc.) which, as active substances, need to meet specific requirements. Recently, the FDA allowed bacteriophage therapy to be used in the United States, via the Emergency Investigational New Drug scheme; clinical trials to compare the safety and efficacy of bacteriophage therapy are also permitted. To date, several therapeutic products of this type have made it to phase I or II; some clinical programmes have also been completed. This article cites numerous animal model studies and registered clinical trials, showing the safety and effectiveness of bacteriophage therapy, including infections caused by bacterial strains resistant to antibiotic treatment.
“…However, after a century of use, there is increasing demand for rigorous evaluation of phage therapy, including in the most severe infections . There are case series with generally good outcomes, particularly in osteoarticular infections, diabetic foot infections, and chronic prostatitis . Two reviews detail the history of phage therapy in Russia and Eastern European countries and its application in specific human infections, a 2012 article provides a historical review of phage therapy over the years, and comprehensive up‐to‐date reviews are now also available …”
Summary
Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is re‐emerging a century after it began.
Activity against antibiotic‐resistant pathogens and a lack of serious side effects make phage therapy an attractive treatment option in refractory bacterial infections.
Phages are highly specific for their bacterial targets, but the relationship between in vitro activity and in vivo efficacy remains to be rigorously evaluated.
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of phage therapy are generally based on the classic predator–prey relationship, but numerous other factors contribute to phage clearance and optimal dosing strategies remain unclear.
Combinations of fully characterised, exclusively lytic phages prepared under good manufacturing practice are limited in their availability.
Safety has been demonstrated but randomised controlled trials are needed to evaluate efficacy.
“…Case studies of phage therapy continue to be added to the published literature (Table 1). Patey et al note that the generally positive results reported from isolated applications stand in contrast to the negative results of some clinical trials ( Table 2) (42). The routes of phage administration and dosing intervals, as well as the diversity of target bacteria and infection types, portend that the investigational use of phage therapy will likely continue for some time in the United States.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phages may be used as a complementary approach to currently available antimicrobial strategies rather than a replacement (42). As viruses, they and their components may be recognized by the immune system and eliminated via innate and/or adaptive defenses before reaching sites of infection, and their use may also compromise the future use of similar species in the same patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How phage therapy would be regulated in the United States is presently unclear, with some questioning whether this can be done within the existing drug and device approval infrastructure of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, founded on the concept of drugs as small molecules of fixed composition (42,44,45). Subjecting the production and oversight of therapeutic phage to current good manufacturing practice and evaluation within conventional randomized clinical trials will be associated with significant cost and incite process development inefficiencies (e.g., in a phage cocktail, each phage as well as the final cocktail may require FDA approval; the composition of off-the-shelf phage products might require updating at regular intervals to avoid resistance and to maintain clinical relevance to current pathogens), culminating in approval delays (42,44,46,47). Some countries in which phages are used therapeutically operate under different regulatory guidelines; for example, Belgium uses magistral preparations, the adoption of which some favor on a broader scale (27,46).…”
Treatment of bacterial infections is increasingly challenged by resistance to currently available antibacterial agents. Not only are such agents less likely to be active today than they were in the past, but their very use has selected for and continues to select for further resistance. Additional strategies for the management of bacterial illnesses must be identified. In this review, bacteriophage-based therapies are presented as one promising approach. In anticipation of their potential expansion into clinical medicine, clinical microbiologists may wish to acquaint themselves with bacteriophages and their antibacterial components and, specifically, with methods for testing them. Here, we reviewed the literature spanning January 2007 to March 2019 on bacteriophage and phage-encoded protein therapies of relevance to clinical microbiology.
KEYWORDS bacteriophagesCitation Caflisch KM, Patel R. 2019. Implications of bacteriophage-and bacteriophage component-based therapies for the clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.