2016
DOI: 10.4172/2155-9864.1000373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Importance of PRAME Gene Expression in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…PRAME gene as a class of tumor antigen, having a varied expression in a different malignancy like chronic lymphoproliferative disorders, multiple myeloma, acute, and chronic leukemia's. As a result of aberrant mRNA Baren et al, were the reported cases, which was lesser compared to our study [5,6,9,[15][16][17][18]. These discrepancies of results between all these studies may be due to the various set of leukemic cells expressed in different population set-up (ethnicity), the number of patients recruited, and numerous age groups like a pediatric, adult, and elderly patients for the analysis used to detect the PRAME gene expression rate are the other causes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…PRAME gene as a class of tumor antigen, having a varied expression in a different malignancy like chronic lymphoproliferative disorders, multiple myeloma, acute, and chronic leukemia's. As a result of aberrant mRNA Baren et al, were the reported cases, which was lesser compared to our study [5,6,9,[15][16][17][18]. These discrepancies of results between all these studies may be due to the various set of leukemic cells expressed in different population set-up (ethnicity), the number of patients recruited, and numerous age groups like a pediatric, adult, and elderly patients for the analysis used to detect the PRAME gene expression rate are the other causes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…The PRAME gene expression rate was 87% reported by Steger et al and 74% by Baraka et al and was higher when compared to our study. PRAME gene expression rate was 52.9% by A Spanaki et al, 42% by D Steinbach et al, 38.2% by Ding et al, 31.3% Abdel Malak et al, and 25% by Baren et al, were the reported cases, which was lesser compared to our study [ 5 , 6 , 9 , 15 – 18 ]. These discrepancies of results between all these studies may be due to the various set of leukemic cells expressed in different population set-up (ethnicity), the number of patients recruited, and numerous age groups like a pediatric, adult, and elderly patients for the analysis used to detect the PRAME gene expression rate are the other causes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations