Clinical Importance of Intraoperative Cephalic Vein Distensibility as a Predictor of Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation

Abstract

Radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) is the preferred vascular access, but the maturation failure rate is high. Poor vein distensibility is the main cause of maturation failure. There have been several studies regarding vein distensibility, but vein dilation protocol and the cut-off value predicting maturation failure were inconsistent. We were doubtful that the vein distensibility had been appropriately evaluated, and sought to determine a more clinically applicable parameter. The cephalic vein was dilated via intraluminal hydrostatic pressure during the surgery and the vein size was measured. Maturation failure occurred in 30 patients (22.4%) and was more common in females and in patients who had a previous history of arteriovenous access formation (p = 0.0095 and p = 0.014). The intraoperative postdilation diameter, and the difference between pre and postdilation diameters differed between the two groups (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0004). The cut-off value of the postdilation diameter, which indicated a high probability of maturation success, was >4 mm, and the cut-off value which indicated a higher probability of maturation failure; that is, the difference between the pre and postdilation diameter, was ≤2.2 mm. The degree of distensibility of the cephalic vein may be an important determinant of RCAVF maturation.

Diameter Criteria Have Limited Value for Prediction of Functional Dialysis Use of Arteriovenous Fistulas

“…40 Small studies of vein quality are promising: several studies reported an association between venous distensibility and FDU. 14,21,41…”

New Insights into Dialysis Vascular Access: What Is the Optimal Vascular Access Type and Timing of Access Creation in CKD and Dialysis Patients?

“…To further complicate the situation, some authors have shown that there can be substantial overlap in the vein diameters of those whose AVF fail and those that succeed (7). Vein quality (e.g., distensibility) has not been studied extensively (59)(60)(61); however, the great majority of surgeons would not use a vein that appears sclerotic on either preoperative duplex ultrasound or direct examination. In such patients, re-evaluation is required to decide on an AV graft in the same location or an AVF with alternate vessels.…”

Hemodialysis vascular access in the elderly—getting it right

“…This evidence may be particularly concerning in the elderly population, who may experience additional impaired integrity and distensibility of the vein due to advanced age and presumably longer exposure to comorbid conditions such as peripheral vascular disease, venipunctures, and other vascular traumas that may further compromise the maturation process of AVFs. 56,58,[70][71][72][73] For elderly patients with marginal vessel size and/or quality, creation of a forearm AVG may be preferred over an AVF, 74 as previously discussed. Based on a randomized controlled trial that enrolled 182 patients with marginal forearm vessels (defined as radial artery 1-2 mm and/or cephalic vein r e v i e w diameter #1.6 mm on preoperative vascular mapping), placement of a brachial-antecubital forearm AVG resulted in superior 1-year patency and cumulative survival (44% and 79%) compared with a radiocephalic AVF (33% and 79%).…”