2018
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Implications of the 2016 International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery Definition and Grading of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula on 775 Consecutive Pancreatic Resections

Abstract: The present study has confirmed the pertinence of the changes introduced in the 2016 ISGPS POPF definition and grading. This updated classification is effective in identifying three conditions that differ in terms of clinical and economic outcomes. These results suggested the reliability of the new definition and scheme in classifying POPF-related outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
72
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
72
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcome measures of the present trial were adapted retrospectively according to the new definition of POPF, but the incidence of biochemical leakage was kept in the report in order to provide a complete picture of the tightening capacity of fibrin sealant patches. The proportion of patients with biochemical leakage was significantly higher here than reported previously, whereas the incidence of grade B and C POPF was not. The authors are not able to provide a conclusive explanation for this as the participating centres have a high annual caseload of pancreatic resections, with pancreatojejunostomy performed according to general standards, with little variation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…The outcome measures of the present trial were adapted retrospectively according to the new definition of POPF, but the incidence of biochemical leakage was kept in the report in order to provide a complete picture of the tightening capacity of fibrin sealant patches. The proportion of patients with biochemical leakage was significantly higher here than reported previously, whereas the incidence of grade B and C POPF was not. The authors are not able to provide a conclusive explanation for this as the participating centres have a high annual caseload of pancreatic resections, with pancreatojejunostomy performed according to general standards, with little variation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Age correlated with a higher risk of postoperative morbidity, whereas it was associated with better physical status in the analysis of QoL in the longer term. Morbidity (59·3 per cent) and 90‐day mortality (3·3 per cent) rates were comparable to the rates of 32–69 and 0–5 per cent respectively reported in other large studies of postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. As reported previously, the present study identified older age and long operating time as independent risk factors for major postoperative complications, whereas no specific risk factor for death could be identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Because postoperative outcomes after total pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy are almost comparable, the primary concern in extending resection to the entire pancreas is therefore related to the inevitable long‐term morbidity associated with the apancreatic state. Total pancreatectomy is characterized by complete loss of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions, and therefore by intestinal malabsorption and a diabetic state defined as ‘brittle’, owing to the challenging management of blood glucose levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation in clinical severity led to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) to develop a standardized grading system for pancreatic fistulae, which subcategorizes the fistula into either Grade A, B, or C. Grade A fistulae are essentially subclinical and were recently reclassified as biochemical leaks, while grades B and C fistulae have significant downstream effects and together can be considered clinically‐relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR‐POPF) . These definitions have been validated and are well accepted in clinical practice …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 These definitions have been validated and are well accepted in clinical practice. [7][8][9] Significant efforts have been aimed at identifying risk factors that predict CR-POPF formation. The most well-validated predictive model is the fistula risk score (FRS), which uses pancreatic duct diameter, gland texture, intraoperative blood loss, and pathology to stratify patient risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%