2016
DOI: 10.1111/epi.13639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical implications of SCN1A missense and truncation variants in a large Japanese cohort with Dravet syndrome

Abstract: We found significant differences in the distribution of truncating and missense variants across the SCN1A sequence among healthy individuals, patients with DS, and those with milder forms of SCN1A-variant positive epilepsy. Testing for associations with phenotype revealed that variant type can be predictive of rate of cognitive decline. Analysis of descriptive medication data suggests that in addition to conventional drug therapy in DS, bromide, clonazepam and topiramate may reduce seizure frequency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
71
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
71
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, from our previous work on Dravet syndrome [15], we found PolyPhen-2 to be the most reliable predictor. To certify this formally, we compare the performance of the other three aforementioned pathogenicity scores against PolyPhen-2 using the area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver-operating characteristic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, from our previous work on Dravet syndrome [15], we found PolyPhen-2 to be the most reliable predictor. To certify this formally, we compare the performance of the other three aforementioned pathogenicity scores against PolyPhen-2 using the area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver-operating characteristic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We chose 22 subjects at opposite ends of a phenotypic distribution (11 mild and 11 severe) from a large cohort of Japanese patients with SCN1A truncation variants [15]. During the course of the study the two youngest patients in the mild category progressed to a more severe phenotype, leaving 9 individuals in the mild group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations