2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01867.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical implications of enteric and central D2 receptor blockade by antidopaminergic gastrointestinal prokinetics

Abstract: SUMMARYAntidopaminergic gastrointestinal prokinetics (bromopride, clebopride, domperidone, levosulpiride and metoclopramide) have been exploited clinically for the management of motor disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract, including functional dyspepsia, gastric stasis of various origins and emesis. The prokinetic effect of these drugs is mediated through the blockade of enteric (neuronal and muscular) inhibitory D 2 receptors. The pharmacological profiles of the marketed compounds differ in terms of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
207
0
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
207
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…5-HT 4 receptors, moreover, like D 2 , are most concentrated on neurites within enteric ganglia (Liu et al, 2005). Domperidone (Barone, 1999;Drolet et al, 2000) and tegaserod are both used therapeutically as prokinetic agents, although domperidone is often thought to be more effective on the proximal gut (Longo and Vernava, 1993;Jost, 1997) and so has been used to relieve the symptoms of dyspepsia and gastroparesis (Horowitz and Fraser, 1995;Tonini et al, 2004), whereas tegaserod is used to treat chronic constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (Prather et al, 2000;Muller-Lissner et al, 2001;Johanson, 2004;Galligan and Vanner, 2005). Domperidone and DA, however, have both been shown to exert effects on the colon and rectum as well as on the upper bowel (Wiley and Owyang, 1987), whereas tegaserod accelerates gastric emptying (Degen et al, 2001;James et al, 2004;Crowell et al, 2005) and has also been useful in treating dyspepsia and gastroparesis (Banh et al, 2005;Galligan and Vanner, 2005;Zuberi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5-HT 4 receptors, moreover, like D 2 , are most concentrated on neurites within enteric ganglia (Liu et al, 2005). Domperidone (Barone, 1999;Drolet et al, 2000) and tegaserod are both used therapeutically as prokinetic agents, although domperidone is often thought to be more effective on the proximal gut (Longo and Vernava, 1993;Jost, 1997) and so has been used to relieve the symptoms of dyspepsia and gastroparesis (Horowitz and Fraser, 1995;Tonini et al, 2004), whereas tegaserod is used to treat chronic constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (Prather et al, 2000;Muller-Lissner et al, 2001;Johanson, 2004;Galligan and Vanner, 2005). Domperidone and DA, however, have both been shown to exert effects on the colon and rectum as well as on the upper bowel (Wiley and Owyang, 1987), whereas tegaserod accelerates gastric emptying (Degen et al, 2001;James et al, 2004;Crowell et al, 2005) and has also been useful in treating dyspepsia and gastroparesis (Banh et al, 2005;Galligan and Vanner, 2005;Zuberi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibitory effect of dopamine is exerted through activation of prejunctional D 2 receptors located on cholinergic neurons leading to delayed gastric emptying. Indeed, in patients with PD, peripheral dopamine D 2 antagonist domperidone improves gastric emptying delayed by L-DOPA treatment [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domperidone, a dopamine antagonist that does not cross the blood-brain barrier and operates primarily through peripheral (DA 2 ) receptors, is available for use throughout Europe, as well as in Canada, Mexico, and South America but not in the United States. 9,10 The efficacy of metoclopramide in motility disorders has been far from consistent, and its long-term use has been complicated by a trend toward tolerance and a significant incidence of CNS side effects. 11 Up to 25% of patients may experience side effects, the most troubling of which are extrapyramidal reactions.…”
Section: Dopamine Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%