2020
DOI: 10.3390/toxins12080499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Implications of Difference in Antigenicity of Different Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Preparations: Clinical Take-Home Messages from Our Research Pool and Literature

Abstract: The three different botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) preparations being licensed in Europe and the U.S. differ in protein content, which seems to be a major factor influencing the antigenicity of BoNT/A. In the present study, several arguments out of our research pool were collected to demonstrate that the clinical response and antigenicity were different for the three BoNT/A preparations: some results of (1) a cross-sectional study on clinical outcome and antibody formation of 212 patients with cervical dyston… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In children with CP secondary non-response was associated with neutralizing antibody (NAB) formation in up to 75% [ 22 ]. This is consistent with recent cross-sectional studies in adult CD-patients showing a non-linear increase of NAB-formation with duration of therapy [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Nevertheless, the current opinion seems to be that “NAB formation occurs only in a small percentage” of BoNT/A treated patients and does not explain secondary non-response and discontinuation of BoNT therapy in the majority of CD-patients.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In children with CP secondary non-response was associated with neutralizing antibody (NAB) formation in up to 75% [ 22 ]. This is consistent with recent cross-sectional studies in adult CD-patients showing a non-linear increase of NAB-formation with duration of therapy [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Nevertheless, the current opinion seems to be that “NAB formation occurs only in a small percentage” of BoNT/A treated patients and does not explain secondary non-response and discontinuation of BoNT therapy in the majority of CD-patients.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Three different phases of the spontaneous course of CD have been described by neurosurgeons [ 45 , 46 ]. Deterioration is observed during the first 5 years, stable condition during the next 5 years and possible improvement thereafter [ 33 ]. In a recent review remission in dystonia was analyzed [ 46 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common signs of clinical resistance include increasing the frequency or dose of the drug administered to elicit results, complete nonresponse, and partial nonresponse (Fig. 2) [25,42,43].…”
Section: Immunogenicity In Response To Biologic Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common signs of clinical resistance include increasing the frequency or dose of the drug administered to elicit results. Over time, this can lead to clinical nonresponse [25,42,43]. nAb, neutralizing antibody alternative mechanism of action [25,48].…”
Section: Clinical Challenges Of Immunogenicity To Biologic Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients who reliably worsen despite an increase of dose the BoNT preparation should be switched to a complex protein free BoNT/A preparation [ 25 ] well before a complete secondary treatment failure was developed [ 26 ]. In most of the partial secondary non-responders, switching to rimaBoNT/B yields only a transient improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%