2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Implications of a Targeted RNA-Sequencing Panel in the Detection of Gene Fusions in Solid Tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that FISH pointed in a different diagnostic direction in almost one of three cases. A similar concordance of 73.0% between targeted RNA-seq and conventional methods has been described by Sun et al [19]. In terms of probe concordance rate, a positive or negative FISH result was confirmed by targeted RNA-seq in 27 out of 49 (55.1%) and 81 out of 88 (92.0%) analyses, respectively.…”
Section: Methods Performancesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This means that FISH pointed in a different diagnostic direction in almost one of three cases. A similar concordance of 73.0% between targeted RNA-seq and conventional methods has been described by Sun et al [19]. In terms of probe concordance rate, a positive or negative FISH result was confirmed by targeted RNA-seq in 27 out of 49 (55.1%) and 81 out of 88 (92.0%) analyses, respectively.…”
Section: Methods Performancesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We analyzed a total of 210 NSCLC samples by FISH, and we succeeded in characterizing 200 of these samples (95%) by targeted RNA NGS and 198 samples (94%) by RT-PCR. The results of our analyses, together with already published data [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], showed an excellent concordance rate (91%) of the targeted RNA NGS results with the so-far considered gold standard FISH technique, underlining the essential role of the NGS testing approach in the molecular pathology diagnostics laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Several publications have addressed the topic of diagnostic test algorithms for detecting NTRK gene fusions or TRK fusion proteins, using methods such as immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and DNA or RNA-based NGS [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Other publications have described the validation or the clinical implementation of NGS panels capable of detecting gene fusions in solid tumors or hematologic malignancies, providing useful information on defining quality metrics, performance characteristic assessment, verification of novel fusions and troubleshooting [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. However, testing for gene fusions using RNA-based NGS is based on different principles than for DNA-based NGS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%