2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-010-0367-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical implication and prognosis of normal baseline cerebral blood flow with impaired vascular reserve in patients with major cerebral artery occlusive disease

Abstract: In the present prospective study, patients with sufficient baseline CBF showed good prognosis and no difference in recurrent stroke risks even though they had poor CVR in the affected hemisphere, indicating that these patients can be treated by medication for cerebral circulation and baseline diseases if they have high risk factors for neurosurgical treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding adds to those in previous studies that investigated associations between impaired CVR and increased stroke risk. 4,11,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Nine of 12 studies found a positive association of reduced or exhausted CVR and recurrent risk of future ischemic events or stroke by using a range of vasodilatory stimuli and CVR metrics. The negative findings may be explained by insufficient vasodilatory stimuli because 2 of the studies with negative findings 3,4 used carbogen (typically 5% CO 2 ), whereas Markus and Cullinane 11 showed that exhausted CVR as assessed by hypercapnia transcranial Doppler with 6% or 8% CO 2 independently predicted future stroke and that the prediction was stronger for 8% CO 2 challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding adds to those in previous studies that investigated associations between impaired CVR and increased stroke risk. 4,11,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Nine of 12 studies found a positive association of reduced or exhausted CVR and recurrent risk of future ischemic events or stroke by using a range of vasodilatory stimuli and CVR metrics. The negative findings may be explained by insufficient vasodilatory stimuli because 2 of the studies with negative findings 3,4 used carbogen (typically 5% CO 2 ), whereas Markus and Cullinane 11 showed that exhausted CVR as assessed by hypercapnia transcranial Doppler with 6% or 8% CO 2 independently predicted future stroke and that the prediction was stronger for 8% CO 2 challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CVR threshold of 15% between groups B and C was determined based on previous studies, which set thresholds from 10% to 20% [23][24][25] . The CBF b , CBV, OEF, CMRO 2 , and CBF b /CBV ratio were compared between the three groups and evaluated in comparison to the controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hemodynamic parameter has been called cerebrovascular reserve, and there have been two main approaches to measure this risk factor on imaging studies. One approach involves obtaining direct brain CBF measurements using PET [20], nuclear medicine techniques [21,22], CT perfusion [23], or MR perfusion [24,25] before and after a vasodilatory stimulus. The second approach involves measurement of flow velocities as a surrogate for CBF [26,27,28] (typically in the MCA via transcranial Doppler) distal to a lesion both before and after a vasodilatory stimulus.…”
Section: Hemodynamic Stroke Risk Assessment Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%