Abstract:Proton therapy makes use of the favorable depth-dose distribution with its characteristic Bragg peak to spare normal tissue distal of the target volume. A steep dose gradient would be desired in lateral dimensions, too. The widespread spot scanning delivery technique is based, however, on pencil-beams with in-air spot full-widths-at-half-maximum of typically 1 cm or more. This hampers the sparing of organs-at-risk if small-scale structures adjacent to the target volume are concerned. The trimming of spot scann… Show more
“…Although PBS allows for lateral collimation of the beam through the placement of spots conforming to the target extents, it has been shown that a sharper lateral dose fall-off 15 , 16 could be achieved by a patient specific aperture. The use of aperture for PBS adds another layer of complexity for isocenter verification.…”
Treatment of ocular tumors on dedicated scattering-based proton therapy systems is standard afforded due to sharp lateral and distal penumbras. However, most newer proton therapy centers provide pencil beam scanning treatments. In this paper, we present a pencil beam scanning (PBS)-based ocular treatment solution. The design, commissioning, and validation of an applicator mount for a conventional PBS snout to allow for ocular treatments are given. In contrast to scattering techniques, PBS-based ocular therapy allows for inverse planning, providing planners with additional flexibility to shape the radiation field,
potentially sparing healthy tissues. PBS enables the use of commercial Monte Carlo algorithms resulting in accurate dose calculations in the presence of heterogeneities and fiducials. The validation consisted of small field dosimetry measurements of point doses, depth doses, and lateral profiles relevant to ocular therapy. A comparison of beam properties achieved through the applicator against published literature is presented. We successfully showed the feasibility of PBS-based ocular treatments.
“…Although PBS allows for lateral collimation of the beam through the placement of spots conforming to the target extents, it has been shown that a sharper lateral dose fall-off 15 , 16 could be achieved by a patient specific aperture. The use of aperture for PBS adds another layer of complexity for isocenter verification.…”
Treatment of ocular tumors on dedicated scattering-based proton therapy systems is standard afforded due to sharp lateral and distal penumbras. However, most newer proton therapy centers provide pencil beam scanning treatments. In this paper, we present a pencil beam scanning (PBS)-based ocular treatment solution. The design, commissioning, and validation of an applicator mount for a conventional PBS snout to allow for ocular treatments are given. In contrast to scattering techniques, PBS-based ocular therapy allows for inverse planning, providing planners with additional flexibility to shape the radiation field,
potentially sparing healthy tissues. PBS enables the use of commercial Monte Carlo algorithms resulting in accurate dose calculations in the presence of heterogeneities and fiducials. The validation consisted of small field dosimetry measurements of point doses, depth doses, and lateral profiles relevant to ocular therapy. A comparison of beam properties achieved through the applicator against published literature is presented. We successfully showed the feasibility of PBS-based ocular treatments.
“…The fact that the benefit of LP from overscanning decreases with depth can be explained by the lateral scattering of protons increasing with depth. Likewise, additional lateral scattering of the proton beam in combination of collimated PBS with range shifters for shallow tumors as described in various studies 3–6,9,13,25 diminishes the effect. Future research should investigate the overscanning and spot positioning effect in potential clinical setups such as multiple energies, setups with multiple fields, in different range shifter materials and thicknesses, as well as changing the order of range shifter and aperture 3,25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The LP is influenced by the initial spot size, multiple Coulomb scattering in matter (the patient), and optional beam shaping devices in the treatment head (‘nozzle'), such as range shifter or aperture. A sharper LP could be achieved when combining PBS with apertures or multi‐leaf collimators 3–8 . Winterhalter et al 9 .…”
Background: The addition of static or dynamic collimator systems to the pencil beam scanning delivery technique increases the number of options for lateral field shaping. The collimator shape needs to be optimized together with the intensity modulation of spots. Purpose: To minimize the proton field's lateral penumbra by investigating the fundamental relations between spot and collimating aperture edge position. Methods: Analytical approaches describing the effect of spot position on the resulting spot profile are presented. The theoretical description is then compared with Monte Carlo simulations in TOPAS and in the RayStation treatment planning system, as well as with radiochromic film measurements at a clinical proton therapy facility.In the model,one single spot profile is analyzed for various spot positions in air. Further, irradiation setups in water with different energies, the combination with a range shifter, and two-dimensional proton fields were investigated in silico.
Results:The further the single spot is placed beyond the collimating aperture edge ('overscanning'), the sharper the relative lateral dose fall-off and thus the lateral penumbra. Overscanning up to 5 mm reduced the lateral penumbra by about 20% on average after a propagation of 13 cm in air. This benefit from overscanning is first predicted by the analytical proofs and later verified by simulations and measurements.Corresponding analyses in water confirm the benefit in lateral penumbra with spot position optimization as observed theoretically and in air. The combination of spot overscanning with fluence modulation facilitated an additional improvement. Conclusions: The lateral penumbra of single spots in collimated scanned proton fields can be improved by the method of spot overscanning. This suggests a better sparing of proximal organs at risk in smaller water depths at higher energies, especially in the plateau of the depth dose distribution. All in all, spot overscanning in collimated scanned proton fields offers particular potential in combination with techniques such as fluence modulation or dynamic collimation for optimizing the lateral penumbra to spare normal tissue.
“…The pencil-beam scanning (PBS) technique with apertures can in principle be applied as well. [9][10][11] The DFO of a generated SOBP is impacted by the energy spread at the treatment nozzle exit. Here a balance between high dose rate, maximum field size, and energy spread needs to be defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral spreading of the proton beam is typically achieved by a single‐ or double‐scattering systems. The pencil‐beam scanning (PBS) technique with apertures can in principle be applied as well 9–11 …”
Purpose
To evaluate the impact of beam quality in terms of distal fall‐off (DFO, 90%–10%) and lateral penumbra (LP, 80%–20%) of single beam ocular proton therapy (OPT) and to derive resulting ideal requirements for future systems.
Methods
Nine different beam models with DFO varying between 1 and 4 mm and LP between 1 and 4 mm were created. Beam models were incorporated into the RayStation with RayOcular treatment planning system version 10 B (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden). Each beam model was applied for eight typical clinical cases, covering different sizes and locations of uveal melanoma. Plans with and without an additional wedge were created, resulting in 117 plans with a total prescribed median dose of 60 Gy(RBE) to the clinical target volume. Treatment plans were analyzed in terms of V20–V80 penumbra volume, D1 (dose to 1% of the volume) for optic disc and macula, optic nerve V30 (volume receiving 30 Gy(RBE), i.e., 50% of prescription), as well as average dose to lens and ciliary body. An LP‐dependent aperture margin was based on estimated uncertainties, ranging from 1.7 to 4.0 mm.
Results
V20–V80 showed a strong influence by LP, while DFO was less relevant. The optic disc D1 reached an extra dose of up to 3000 cGy(RBE), comparing the defined technical limit of DFO = LP = 1 mm with DFO = 3 mm/LP = 4 mm. The latter may result from a pencil‐beam scanning (PBS) system with static apertures. Plans employing a wedge showed an improvement for organs at risk sparing.
Conclusion
Plan quality is strongly influenced by initial beam parameters. The impact of LP is more pronounced when compared to DFO. The latter becomes important in the treatment of posterior tumors near the macula, optic disc or optic nerve. The plan quality achieved by dedicated OPT nozzles in single‐ or double‐scattering design might not be achievable with modified PBS systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.