2016
DOI: 10.1177/2048872616642952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impact of the 2010–2012 low-end shift of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T

Abstract: NCT0047058, NCT00470587.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifth , some lots of the hs-cTnT assay used clinically in the management of patients in Phase B were affected by the low-end shift. 3336 According to several recent studies, the low-end shift nearly exclusively affected concentrations below 14 ng/L (the 99th percentile) and thereby seemed to have had no relevant impact on the clinical diagnosis of AMI. 3336 Sixth , the findings from our cost analyses must be interpreted carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fifth , some lots of the hs-cTnT assay used clinically in the management of patients in Phase B were affected by the low-end shift. 3336 According to several recent studies, the low-end shift nearly exclusively affected concentrations below 14 ng/L (the 99th percentile) and thereby seemed to have had no relevant impact on the clinical diagnosis of AMI. 3336 Sixth , the findings from our cost analyses must be interpreted carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3336 According to several recent studies, the low-end shift nearly exclusively affected concentrations below 14 ng/L (the 99th percentile) and thereby seemed to have had no relevant impact on the clinical diagnosis of AMI. 3336 Sixth , the findings from our cost analyses must be interpreted carefully. While we adjusted for multiple differences observed between the two phases such as age, history of coronary disease, and presence of arterial hypertension, there may have been differences that cannot be accounted for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of patients with undetectable hs-cTnT levels changed substantially from 62% in 2011 to 42% in 2014 owing to the lower sensitivity of the early batches of reagents that were used for the hs-cTnT assay until April 2012 [10]. The change in the proportion of patients with hs-cTnT levels N 14 ng/l was smaller and the proportion of chest pain patients and MI remained unchanged [13].…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Until now, only 2 manufacturers have overcome the difficulties of developing and introducing hs-cTn assays into clinical practice, 6 of which 1 had major quality issues initially. [33][34][35] These uncertainties and concerns have led to delays in the approval of these assays for clinical care in the United States. 36 The US Food and Drug Administration has only recently ratified the use of the fifth-generation hs-cTnT assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%