2021
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Impact of Presurgery Circulating Tumor DNA after Total Neoadjuvant Treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Biomarker Study from the GEMCAD 1402 Trial

Abstract: Purpose: Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) is a valid strategy for patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Biomarkers of response to TNT are an unmet clinical need. We aimed to determine the value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to predict tumor response, recurrence, and survival in patients with LARC treated with TNT. Experimental Design: The GEMCAD 1402 was a phase II randomized, multicentric clinica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
70
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of the GEMCAD 1402 phase II randomized trial enrolling high-risk LARC patients to receive TNT, 23 subjects with paired baseline and post-TNT/pre-surgery samples using a tumor-uninformed, plasma ctDNA assay showed ctDNA clearance following neoadjuvant treatment (66%) [ 58 ]. Although this was a preplanned analysis limited by small sample size, ctDNA detection was not a predictive biomarker of treatment response on the primary tumor as measured by pCR or neoadjuvant rectal score (NAR, Table 3 ).…”
Section: Prediction Of Response To Neoadjuvant Therapy In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As part of the GEMCAD 1402 phase II randomized trial enrolling high-risk LARC patients to receive TNT, 23 subjects with paired baseline and post-TNT/pre-surgery samples using a tumor-uninformed, plasma ctDNA assay showed ctDNA clearance following neoadjuvant treatment (66%) [ 58 ]. Although this was a preplanned analysis limited by small sample size, ctDNA detection was not a predictive biomarker of treatment response on the primary tumor as measured by pCR or neoadjuvant rectal score (NAR, Table 3 ).…”
Section: Prediction Of Response To Neoadjuvant Therapy In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one common theme appears to be that post-chemoradiation ctDNA status is a critical ctDNA assessment timepoint and most strongly predictive of RFS and various tumor response parameters including tumor regression grade and pCR ( Table 3 ). Several groups have noted that ctDNA following neoadjuvant therapy in LARC cannot differentiate between minimal and no residual disease, and instead ctDNA more specifically reflects the presence of systemic disease rather than local minimal disease [ 51 , 58 ]. In this regard, future investigations into the role of ctDNA in the treatment paradigm of LARC may focus on identifying those who may be adequately treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and TME alone vs. those who would benefit from intensified TNT upfront based on baseline or pretreatment ctDNA positivity [ 55 ].…”
Section: Future Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• 3-year RFS rate: 33% for the post-operative ctDNA-positive patients versus 87% for the post-operative ctDNA-negative patients, irrespective of clinicopathological risk factors (HR 6.0; p < 0.001). Vidal et al 2021 [ 75 ] II–III NGS (Guardant Reveal) 72 0/72 • Detectable pre-surgery ctDNA after chemotherapy significantly associated with systemic recurrence, shorter DFS (HR 4; p = 0.033), and shorter OS (HR 23; p < 0.0001). • No significant association between ctDNA status and pathologic response.…”
Section: Post-surgical Resection With Curative Intentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tie and colleagues, found a recurrence rate significantly higher in 13 and 19 of 159 patients with detectable ctDNA both after pre-operative treatment and after surgery, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 6.6 and 13, respectively [ 74 ]. Similarly, in a cohort of 72 patients undergoing TNT in the GEMCAD 1402 trial, pre-surgery ctDNA detected MRD in 15% and was significantly associated with shorter DFS (HR 4; P = 0.033) and OS (HR 23; P < 0.0001) [ 75 ]. In another study, the overall margin-negative, node-negative resection rate significantly doubled in 17 patients with undetectable versus 9 patients with pre-operative detectable ctDNA (88 vs 44%; P = 0.007) [ 76 ].…”
Section: Post-surgical Resection With Curative Intentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the previously described studies, Vidal et al [89] have recently published a study in which the concept of MMD (minimal metastatic disease) was introduced. This term refers to the detection of ctDNA following TNT and before surgery in patients that are likely to recur at distant sites.…”
Section: Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (Larc)mentioning
confidence: 99%