2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data

Abstract: Recent robust data allow for omitting lymph node dissection for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and without any suspicion of lymph node metastases, without compromising recurrence-free survival (RFS), nor overall survival (OS), in the setting of primary surgical treatment. Evidence supporting the same postulate for patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is lacking. Throughout a systematic literature review, the aim of our study was to eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our meta-analysis, patients exposed to NAC no longer obtained an oncological benefit from more extensive lymphadenectomy. Comparable results were also observed in other solid tumors, including breast cancer and ovarian cancer, where exposure to NAC led to a significant reduction in the number of axillary lymph node dissections [28,29]. Considering that extended PLND might be associated with adverse outcomes, such as longer hospital stay, increased operating time, greater blood loss, and a higher rate of post-operative complications, limiting the extent of PLND might be a reasonable alternative in patients who received NAC [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In our meta-analysis, patients exposed to NAC no longer obtained an oncological benefit from more extensive lymphadenectomy. Comparable results were also observed in other solid tumors, including breast cancer and ovarian cancer, where exposure to NAC led to a significant reduction in the number of axillary lymph node dissections [28,29]. Considering that extended PLND might be associated with adverse outcomes, such as longer hospital stay, increased operating time, greater blood loss, and a higher rate of post-operative complications, limiting the extent of PLND might be a reasonable alternative in patients who received NAC [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In principle, NAC apart from local disease downstaging, may serve a similar purpose to lymph node dissection, eliminating potential micrometastatic spread of cancer [ 23 ]. This phenomenon, which may diminish the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy, has been extensively studied in other solid tumors, including ovarian cancer and breast cancer, where administration of NAC has led to a significant decline in the number of axillary lymph node dissections [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. The results of our study indicate that patients who received NAC may not benefit oncologically from more extensive LN dissection, as the number of retrieved LNs is no longer associated with survival in this cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary debulking surgery, several recent studies have evaluated the role of lymphadenectomy in patients who underwent interval debulking surgery. A systematic literature review from Seidler et al, that included 1094 patients from six retrospective series, suggested no benefit of systematic lymphadenectomy during interval debulking surgery procedure on survival in node-negative, advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients (15). He et al retrospectively analyzed the role of lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients who underwent interval debulking surgery.…”
Section: Univariate and Multivariate Analysis Of The Predictors Of Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%