Abstract:Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with high co-expression of BCL2 and MYC proteins (double-expressor [DE] lymphoma), is considered an adverse prognostic indicator associated mostly with non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL. BCL2/MYC overexpression is associated with B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway activation and, consequently, DE DLBCL may be sensitive to BCR inhibitors. We assessed whether high BCL2/MYC co-expression by RNA sequencing could identify a patient subset responsive to ibrutinib using … Show more
“…An easy-to-use IHC biomarker or gene expression signature could allow for widespread adoption in the clinic, particularly within the community setting. Moreover, a recent retrospective analysis has also demonstrated that non-GCB DLBCLs with high MYC and BCL2 mRNA expression also benefit from the addition of ibrutinib to R-CHOP, 39 which further supports the notion that transcriptional profiling can effectively enrich for responsiveness to BTKi-based regimens in DLBCL.…”
PURPOSE A genetic classifier termed LymphGen accurately identifies diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) subtypes vulnerable to Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis), but is challenging to implement in the clinic and fails to capture all DLBCLs that benefit from BTKi-based therapy. Here, we developed a novel CD5 gene expression signature as a biomarker of response to BTKi-based therapy in DLBCL. METHODS CD5 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on 404 DLBCLs to identify CD5 IHC+ and CD5 IHC– cases, which were subsequently characterized at the molecular level through mutational and transcriptional analyses. A 60-gene CD5 gene expression signature (CD5sig) was constructed using genes differentially expressed between CD5 IHC+ and CD5 IHC– non–germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB DLBCL) DLBCLs. This CD5sig was applied to external DLBCL data sets, including pretreatment biopsies from patients enrolled in the PHOENIX study (n = 584) to define the extent to which the CD5sig could identify non-GCB DLBCLs that benefited from the addition of ibrutinib to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). RESULTS CD5 expression was observed in 12% of non-GCB DLBCLs. CD5+ DLBCLs displayed transcriptional features of B-cell receptor (BCR) activation and were enriched for BCR-activating mutations known to correlate with BTKi sensitivity. However, most CD5+ DLBCLs lacked canonical BCR-activating mutations or were LymphGen-unclassifiable (LymphGen-Other). The CD5sig recapitulated these findings in multiple independent data sets, indicating its utility in identifying DLBCLs with genetic and nongenetic bases for BCR dependence. Supporting this notion, CD5sig+ DLBCLs derived a selective survival advantage from the addition of ibrutinib to R-CHOP in the PHOENIX study, independent of LymphGen classification. CONCLUSION CD5sig is a useful biomarker to identify DLBCLs vulnerable to BTKi-based therapies and complements current biomarker approaches by identifying DLBCLs with genetic and nongenetic bases for BTKi sensitivity.
“…An easy-to-use IHC biomarker or gene expression signature could allow for widespread adoption in the clinic, particularly within the community setting. Moreover, a recent retrospective analysis has also demonstrated that non-GCB DLBCLs with high MYC and BCL2 mRNA expression also benefit from the addition of ibrutinib to R-CHOP, 39 which further supports the notion that transcriptional profiling can effectively enrich for responsiveness to BTKi-based regimens in DLBCL.…”
PURPOSE A genetic classifier termed LymphGen accurately identifies diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) subtypes vulnerable to Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis), but is challenging to implement in the clinic and fails to capture all DLBCLs that benefit from BTKi-based therapy. Here, we developed a novel CD5 gene expression signature as a biomarker of response to BTKi-based therapy in DLBCL. METHODS CD5 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on 404 DLBCLs to identify CD5 IHC+ and CD5 IHC– cases, which were subsequently characterized at the molecular level through mutational and transcriptional analyses. A 60-gene CD5 gene expression signature (CD5sig) was constructed using genes differentially expressed between CD5 IHC+ and CD5 IHC– non–germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB DLBCL) DLBCLs. This CD5sig was applied to external DLBCL data sets, including pretreatment biopsies from patients enrolled in the PHOENIX study (n = 584) to define the extent to which the CD5sig could identify non-GCB DLBCLs that benefited from the addition of ibrutinib to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). RESULTS CD5 expression was observed in 12% of non-GCB DLBCLs. CD5+ DLBCLs displayed transcriptional features of B-cell receptor (BCR) activation and were enriched for BCR-activating mutations known to correlate with BTKi sensitivity. However, most CD5+ DLBCLs lacked canonical BCR-activating mutations or were LymphGen-unclassifiable (LymphGen-Other). The CD5sig recapitulated these findings in multiple independent data sets, indicating its utility in identifying DLBCLs with genetic and nongenetic bases for BCR dependence. Supporting this notion, CD5sig+ DLBCLs derived a selective survival advantage from the addition of ibrutinib to R-CHOP in the PHOENIX study, independent of LymphGen classification. CONCLUSION CD5sig is a useful biomarker to identify DLBCLs vulnerable to BTKi-based therapies and complements current biomarker approaches by identifying DLBCLs with genetic and nongenetic bases for BTKi sensitivity.
“…In the Phoenix clinical trial, the 3-year OS and PFS in the intent-to-treat population treated with ibrutinib plus R-CHOP were 85.8% and 70.8%, respectively [ 21 ]. Compared to the Phoenix study, the performance status of the patients in this study was worse (ECOG = 2, 42.1% vs. 9.1%), with an increase in the proportion of patients with BM involvement (21.1% vs. 11.9%), DEL involvement (57.9% vs. 43.6%) [ 37 ], extranodal involvement ≥ 2 (47.4% vs. 31%), and IPI 3–5 (57.9% vs. 43.6%). Due to the limited number and the heterogeneity of patients in this research, the OS and PFS of the non-GCB group were lower than in the Phoenix study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In the phase 3 PHOENIX trial, DEL patients receiving ibrutinib plus R-CHOP had comparable OS (HR: 1.042, 95%CI: [1.708–1.534], P = 0.8338) and EFS (HR: 0.987, 95%CI: [0.608–1.601], P = 0.9573) to non-DEL patients. Moreover, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP increased EFS and OS in patients younger than 60 years old with DEL compared to R-CHOP, but there was no significant difference in older patients [ 37 ]. BTKi have shown potential benefits in the treatment of DEL patients, but further research is needed to discover its specific mechanism toward DEL, and whether they might aid older DEL patients.…”
Currently, combining chemotherapy with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) has demonstrated significant effectiveness in treating patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Orelabrutinib is a second-generation BTK inhibitor, and presently, there have been few reports of Orelabrutinib being used to treat DLBCL. We conducted a retrospective investigation to explore the safety and efficacy of Orelabrutinib in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The study comprised 19 patients with a median age of 61 years. The overall response rate (ORR) was 89.5% with a complete response (CR) rate of 73.7% and a partial response rate (PR) of 15.8%. The estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78.6% (95%CI, 59.8%–100%) and 72.2% (95% CI, 52.4%–99.6%), respectively, with a median follow-up time of 11 months (range 2–24). The most prevalent grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs), neutropenia (52.6%), anemia (36.8%), thrombocytopenia (26.3%), febrile neutropenia (26.3%), and lung infection (10.5%), were the most common. Our results reveal that Orelabrutinib is an effective therapy for DLBCL patients. Furthermore, our first investigation of the Orelabrutinib application lays a foundation for larger retrospective studies.
“…It was also associated with more frequent adverse events (e.g., febrile neutropenia) 58 . Post‐hoc gene expression analysis of tumor samples revealed superior EFS and OS in patients <60‐years‐of‐age with DEL, MCD and N1 non‐GCB disease 59 . Similarly, in the single‐arm phase II IVORY trial of 24 patients with EBV+ DLBCL, I‐RCHOP yielded a more favorable CR in patients <65‐years‐old relative to matched cases treated with R‐CHOP (87% vs. 69%) 60 .…”
Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease with varying clinical outcomes. Our understanding of its molecular makeup continues to improve risk stratification, and artificial‐intelligence and ctDNA‐based analyses have the potential to enhance risk assessment and disease monitoring. R‐CHOP and Pola‐R‐CHP are used in the frontline setting; chimeric antigen receptor therapy (CART) is now the new standard‐of‐care for most with primary refractory disease; both CART and autologous stem cell transplantation are utilized in the relapsed and refractory setting. In this review, we summarize the classification and management of DLBCL with an emphasis on recent advances in the field.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.