2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06355-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impact of a new cone beam CT angiography respiratory motion artifact reduction algorithm during hepatic intra-arterial interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies examined the feasibility of using software enhancement to correct artefacts resulting from breathing motion 23,24 . CBCT imaging is affected by respiratory motion artefacts, which were reported to corrupt image quality and reduce diagnostic confidence in up to 10% of cases 23 . Both studies described an increase in image quality with no significant degradation 23 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two studies examined the feasibility of using software enhancement to correct artefacts resulting from breathing motion 23,24 . CBCT imaging is affected by respiratory motion artefacts, which were reported to corrupt image quality and reduce diagnostic confidence in up to 10% of cases 23 . Both studies described an increase in image quality with no significant degradation 23 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies have demonstrated that the software has led to faster procedures. 14,17,19,23,28 Iwazawa et al reported that the software contributed to procedures being completed approximately 12% more quickly. 14 Specific software features facilitate the acceleration of certain parts of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…; (3) calculation, using a robust cost function, of a nonperiodic, smooth elastic 3D motion vector field describing the nonrigid deformation map between the projection images and the motion-blurred volume; and (4) re-reconstruction of the volume using the motion-corrected projection images. Iterate over steps 2 to 4 using an appropriate stopping criterion [117][118][119][120] (see Fig. 21 for an example of achievable image quality improvement).…”
Section: Breathing Motion Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%