issue (1). The goal of their study was to evaluate the capacity of 99m Tclabeled macroaggregated albumin (MAA) uptake to predict 90 Ylabeled resin microsphere uptake on posttherapeutic 90 Y bremsstrahlung SPECT imaging. The authors found a significant yet low correlation between 99m Tc-MAA and 90 Y-microsphere uptake in the different tumors tested. When 99m Tc-MAA uptake was found to be high, high 90 Y-microsphere uptake was almost always observed (i.e., 97% of cases), whereas low 99m Tc-MAA uptake correlated with high 90 Y-microsphere in 67% of cases.These results are in clear contradiction to those of several other studies that have demonstrated the accuracy of 99m Tc-MAA-based dosimetry in the prediction of response and survival, suggesting a good correlation between 99m Tc-MAA and 90 Y-microsphere uptake (2-5).This study therefore requires further discussion and clarification. For many years now, there has been debate surrounding the question of whether 99m Tc-MAA is a good surrogate for 90 Y-microsphere distribution, as 99m Tc-MAA particles are not of exactly the same size and density as 90 Y-microspheres.The first point clearly recognized when considering 99m Tc-MAA as a surrogate for 90 Y-microsphere distribution is the fact that 99m Tc-MAA and 90 Y-microsphere injection should be performed precisely at the same site, meaning the same artery and at the same distance from the arterial bifurcation, with application of the same angulation of the microcatheter in the arterial lumen. In this study, no details were provided on either the exact microcatheter positioning or the accuracy of the repositioning. Where there were discrepancies between 99m Tc-MAA and 90 Y-microsphere uptake, this point should have been further assessed. A second key point to carefully monitor is the vasoactive status of the arterial tree at the time of 99m Tc-MAA or 90 Y-microsphere injection. Less is known on this subject than on microcatheter positioning, yet there have been cases of huge discrepancies between 99m Tc-MAA and 90 Y-microsphere uptake related not to inaccurate catheter repositioning but to vasospasm observed on only 1 of the 2 angiographies performed, namely the diagnostic angiography (6). However, this issue has not been addressed in the Ilhan et al. study.Presently, the debate centers not only on whether 99m Tc-MAA alone is a good surrogate for microsphere distribution but also on whether the treatment simulation (including preferential flow at diagnostic angiography and 99m Tc-MAA scintigraphy) is a good surrogate for 90 Y-microsphere distribution. This is of major interest, as it means that during the diagnostic angiography, special care should be taken to use 99m Tc-MAA as a 90 Y-microsphere surrogate.