2016
DOI: 10.1111/voxs.12260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impact and prevalence of IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses in antenatal alloimmunized women: experience from a tertiary medical centre in South India

Abstract: Background Haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn (HDFN) occurs due to maternal sensitization to paternal antigens. According to literature, IgG1 and IgG3 have a greater impact when compared to IgG2 and IgG4. To date, there is limited literature available from India. The current study was therefore executed using the column agglutination technique (CAT) for subclass identification (IgG1 and IgG3). The findings might be important to facilitate early referral, to centers where appropriate care is possible.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that IgG subclasses 1 and 3 are the predominant immunoglobulins detected in HDFN. HDFN was more severe when both subclasses were present than when only IgG1 as proposed in studies such as [28,29]. Contrary to this, [30] found IgG1 and IgG3 of anti-D had no predictive value by themselves and therefore could not predict HDFN but concluded the subclasses should be further explored for evaluating the HDFN severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It has been reported that IgG subclasses 1 and 3 are the predominant immunoglobulins detected in HDFN. HDFN was more severe when both subclasses were present than when only IgG1 as proposed in studies such as [28,29]. Contrary to this, [30] found IgG1 and IgG3 of anti-D had no predictive value by themselves and therefore could not predict HDFN but concluded the subclasses should be further explored for evaluating the HDFN severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%