2004
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00435.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical governance and the learning organization

Abstract: Both approaches emphasize cultural changes as essential underpinnings to quality improvement. However, the two approaches also differ fundamentally in their logic of action. Clinical governance is essentially 'top down', being built around formal standards, established procedures, and regular monitoring and reporting. In contrast, organizational learning emphasizes 'bottom up' changes in values, beliefs and motivations in such a way that learning and change are prioritized. The challenge for managers and pract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows the importance of CG dimensions in both groups of hospitals. Organizational learning received the highest rank in both hospitals which it gives support to some similar studies stressing this point (35,36). Figure 2.…”
Section: Cg= Clinical Governancesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Table 3 shows the importance of CG dimensions in both groups of hospitals. Organizational learning received the highest rank in both hospitals which it gives support to some similar studies stressing this point (35,36). Figure 2.…”
Section: Cg= Clinical Governancesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A learning organization is defined as an organization that exhibits adaptability, learns from mistakes, explores situations for development, and optimizes the contribution of its personnel (Wilkinson, Rushmer, & Davies, 2004). Senge outlined five personal disciplines that are key features of a learning organization: system thinking, personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, and team learning (Senge, 1990).…”
Section: Learning Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for service redesign is that reviewing current practices while identifying and removing obstacles will improve quality, efficiency and patient care [8]. Key reforms have focussed on the structural changes casting NHS Trusts as providers of care and strengthening the role of the organisations which commission services [9]; the establishment of ‘Foundation Trusts’ which have greater independence and freedom to manage their ‘business’ as determined by the board [10]; the use of Private Finance Initiatives (also known as Public Private Partnerships) designed to enable public hospitals to access private finance to fund capital projects [11], and encouraging Trusts to become ‘learning organisations’ to facilitate change processes to improve quality and safety [2,12]. Drawing on the work of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, The NHS Plan [13], a major government policy document setting out a ten year plan of health reform, cited ‘redesign’ 17 times and raised expectations of a ‘system-wide programme of reform’ [14].…”
Section: Background and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%