1996
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical fMRI: Implementation and Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The direction of movement (right or left) was unpredictable except at the Ϯ9°location when the next target was always toward the screen center. Visual stimuli were generated using locally developed CIGAL software [Voyvodic, 1996] and an in-house visual presentation system [Thulborn et al, 1996a]. Stimuli were projected onto a rear projection screen spanning 10°vertically and 20°horizontally, which subjects viewed from an angled mirror fixed to the head coil.…”
Section: Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direction of movement (right or left) was unpredictable except at the Ϯ9°location when the next target was always toward the screen center. Visual stimuli were generated using locally developed CIGAL software [Voyvodic, 1996] and an in-house visual presentation system [Thulborn et al, 1996a]. Stimuli were projected onto a rear projection screen spanning 10°vertically and 20°horizontally, which subjects viewed from an angled mirror fixed to the head coil.…”
Section: Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to its increasing popularity within the cognitive and basic neuroscience communities, it is also becoming increasingly popular for clinical purposes since the first applications in epileptic [Jackson et al, 1994] and schizophrenic patients [Wenz et al, 1994], which have led to the introduction of the concept of 'clinical fMRI' [Levin et al, 1995;Thulborn et al, 1996]. Clinical fMRI has thus been applied to patients with various pathologies to assess the functional reorganisation and plasticity after brain damage [for review, see Detre and Floyd, 2001;Matthews et al, 1999;Powell et al, 2004;Price and Crinion, 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9,17 The comprehensive MRI protocol for patient studies, involving anatomic, diffusion, perfusion, and sodium imaging, has been reported elsewhere. 18 Acquisition parameters for fMRI using gradient-echo echo-planar imaging at 3.0 T were as follows: TRϭ4000 ms; TEϭ25 ms; field of view (FOV), 40ϫ20; voxel size, 3.1ϫ3.1ϫ3.0 mm 3 ; slice thickness/ gap, 3/1 mm; and nϭ18 slices.…”
Section: Imaging Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%