2017
DOI: 10.1111/jsap.12631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical findings and results of diagnostic imaging in 82 dogs with gastrointestinal ulceration

Abstract: In dogs with non-perforated ulcers, survey radiography was usually negative whereas ultrasonography and CT frequently enabled detection of the site of the ulcer; in dogs with perforated ulcers, radiography was frequently positive for peritoneal gas and CT was a sensitive modality for both the ulcer and signs of perforation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the authors’ experience, this feature could be helpful for differentiating gastric pneumatosis from focal gastric ulceration. While focal gastric ulceration can also present with intraparietal gas, wall thickening, and loss of layering, these changes would be less likely to appear as diffuse as those seen in the current cases with gastric pneumatosis. Gastric distension was detected in four of our cases, which could possibly have caused mucosal damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the authors’ experience, this feature could be helpful for differentiating gastric pneumatosis from focal gastric ulceration. While focal gastric ulceration can also present with intraparietal gas, wall thickening, and loss of layering, these changes would be less likely to appear as diffuse as those seen in the current cases with gastric pneumatosis. Gastric distension was detected in four of our cases, which could possibly have caused mucosal damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity of AFAST scanning compared to an ultrasound examination performed by a board-certified radiologist was 17 per cent and 65 per cent, respectively, for non-perforated ulcers, but went up to 79 per cent and 86 per cent when the ulcer was perforated (Fitzgerald and others 2017). …”
Section: Impact Of Nsaids On the Gi Tractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although seemingly rare, ICC perforation should be discussed with owners as a potential complication of ileoscopy when weighing the risks and benefits of the procedure. Endoscopic‐induced perforation should be considered as a differential diagnosis for animals with abdominal distention or clinical deterioration after endoscopy; abdominal radiography remains the imaging modality of choice for diagnosis …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic-induced perforation should be considered as a differential diagnosis for animals with abdominal distention or clinical deterioration after endoscopy; abdominal radiography remains the imaging modality of choice for diagnosis. 18,19 Several risk factors have been associated with gastrointestinal perforation secondary to gastroduodenoscopy. Weight <10 kg is associated with increased risk of perforation in animals undergoing F I G U R E 2 Photographs obtain of the ICC junction surgically removed by resection and anastamosis from a dog 5 days after endoscopy.…”
Section: Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%