2020
DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2019.0100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Features of Duane Retraction Syndrome: A New Classification

Abstract: We sought to provide a new classification system for Duane retraction syndrome (DRS) according to type and angle of strabismus during primary gaze and to analyze the clinical features of each DRS type. Methods: The medical records of 65 DRS patients who visited the department of pediatric ophthalmology at Seoul National University Children's Hospital between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients whose angle of exotropia at primary gaze exceeded 3 prism diopters (PDs) were classified as "Exo-Dua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies have reported the same. [ 10 20 ] Similar to other studies, most strabismic patients in this study had small angle deviation and good visual acuity. [ 21 ] In this study, 25.9% of DRS cases showed overshoots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Most studies have reported the same. [ 10 20 ] Similar to other studies, most strabismic patients in this study had small angle deviation and good visual acuity. [ 21 ] In this study, 25.9% of DRS cases showed overshoots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…According to Murillo-Corea et al, (10) prevalence of DRS is about 1/1000 in general population, with 60% female predominance. DRS accounts for 4% of all strabismus cases, most commonly is due to congenital aberrant ocular innervation A study conducted in 2020 by Yun Jeong Lee et al (11) showed that DRS was more in males with a percentage of 56.9% compared to females by 43.1%. Concerning systemic association, only 10.8% of all cases showed systemic disease, of which only 1.5% had neurological delay .…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning systemic association, only 10.8% of all cases showed systemic disease, of which only 1.5% had neurological delay . (11) In Egypt, another study made in 2020, including 238 DRS cases. (12) Gaballah K. et al identified type I to be the most common and type II was the least.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eminently, Lee et al classified DRS into Exo-, Ortho-, and Eso-DRS subtypes according to the horizontal deviation angle at the primary gaze [ 87 ]. Compared with the traditional Huber classification for DRS, their new classification system is more convenient and practically useful in clinical settings.…”
Section: Prospects: Optimizing Decisions Upon Molecular Genetic Diagn...mentioning
confidence: 99%