1998
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.1.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical features and serum antinuclear antibodies in 230 Danish patients with systemic sclerosis

Abstract: The objective was to investigate the relationship between the presence of different types of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and the presence of clinical features. Sera from 230 patients with SSc were tested for the presence of ANA, including anticentromere antibodies (ab), antitopoisomerase I ab, anti-U1 RNP ab and antinucleolar ab, including anti-Th RNP, anti-U3 RNP and anti-U17 RNP. Clinical features were registered prospectively in a clinical database. Eighty-two per … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
117
4
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
14
117
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the ratio was 1.7 (252/146) at the Royal Free Hospital in the UK (Nihtyanova et al 2014), 2.1 (273/132) at Kitasato University in Japan (Hashimoto et al 2011), and 2.9 (127/44) at Keio University in Japan (Shirai et al 2015). In addition, the 10-year survival rate in our study (92.0%) was greater than that found in previous studies from Japan and Western countries (72.6%-88.0%) (Jacobsen et al 2001;Czirjak et al 2008;Hashimoto et al 2011). The reason for these discrepancies remains unclear; however, the prevalence of limited type without internal organ involvement has been increasing in recent years (Ferri et al 2014), which may have attributed to these differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…For example, the ratio was 1.7 (252/146) at the Royal Free Hospital in the UK (Nihtyanova et al 2014), 2.1 (273/132) at Kitasato University in Japan (Hashimoto et al 2011), and 2.9 (127/44) at Keio University in Japan (Shirai et al 2015). In addition, the 10-year survival rate in our study (92.0%) was greater than that found in previous studies from Japan and Western countries (72.6%-88.0%) (Jacobsen et al 2001;Czirjak et al 2008;Hashimoto et al 2011). The reason for these discrepancies remains unclear; however, the prevalence of limited type without internal organ involvement has been increasing in recent years (Ferri et al 2014), which may have attributed to these differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In Japan, prevalence was estimated at 5% in one study, and 11% in a later study (2,15). In Europe, important variations exist between countries: a prevalence of 3-9% was seen in France and Italy, while a prevalence of 20-22% was seen in Denmark and the UK (12,14,16,21,22). The aims of the present study were to assess the prevalence of anti-RNAP III in a new French cohort and to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports to assess the prevalence of anti-RNAP III in patients worldwide and the potential factors explaining the observed heterogeneity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are 2 subtypes of SSc, i.e., diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc), according to the extent of cutaneous involvement (2); dcSSc has more extensive skin involvement, including the trunk or proximal extremities, and is associated with more internal organ involvement such as significant interstitial lung disease (ILD), cardiomyopathy, and scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) and with increased mortality (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%