2017
DOI: 10.5222/mmj.2017.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical features and outcome of preseptal and orbital cellulitis in hospitalized children: Four years experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,[17][18][19] However, there are also other studies in which the incidence of sinusitis is lower in patients with preseptal cellulitis. 7,16 This is in concordance with our results where all patients with orbital cellulitis were associated with sinusitis. 2 CT is the most useful imaging method in the diagnosis of sinusitis and in evaluating a patient with orbital infection and can also reveal the presence of complications such as orbital abscess and subperiosteal abscess.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…15,[17][18][19] However, there are also other studies in which the incidence of sinusitis is lower in patients with preseptal cellulitis. 7,16 This is in concordance with our results where all patients with orbital cellulitis were associated with sinusitis. 2 CT is the most useful imaging method in the diagnosis of sinusitis and in evaluating a patient with orbital infection and can also reveal the presence of complications such as orbital abscess and subperiosteal abscess.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…15,17–19 However, there are also other studies in which the incidence of sinusitis is lower in patients with preseptal cellulitis. 7,16 This is in concordance with our results where all patients with orbital cellulitis were associated with sinusitis. 2…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…WBC count was significantly higher in patients with groups 2, 3, and 4 than group 1 in two studies (Devrim et al, 12 P < .01; Santos et al, 13 P = .025). CRP was significantly higher in patients with groups 2, 3, and 4 than group 1 in four studies (Öcal Demir et al, 14 P = .02; Devrim et al, 12 P < .01; Ohana‐Sarna‐Cahan et al, 18 P < .001; Santos et al, 13 P < .001). Patients with groups 2, 3, and 4 had a significantly higher fever rate in three studies (Botting et al, 21 P < .001; Ohana‐Sarna‐Cahan et al, 18 P = .0001; Santos et al, 13 P = .029).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%