2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical features affecting survival in metastatic NSCLC treated with immunotherapy: A critical review of published data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
43
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
2
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies suggest that the prognosis of immunotherapy is independent of age (34). We found better treatment outcomes in younger patients, while no significant difference in survival was observed between patients with different ages.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Recent studies suggest that the prognosis of immunotherapy is independent of age (34). We found better treatment outcomes in younger patients, while no significant difference in survival was observed between patients with different ages.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…In our retrospective study, we identified six independent prognostic factors associated with the risk of developing EP: sex, ECOG PS, steroid use, number of metastatic sites, liver and pleural metastasis. Female patients, despite the confirmed overall OS benefit over standard chemotherapy, have been shown to derive lower benefit compared to males across the main clinical trials of mono-immunotherapy, both in first-line and further line setting [15]. Our findings confirm a potential negative prognostic impact of the female sex in patients receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy as front-line treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In recent years, immunotherapy has become integrated into the treatment plan of NSCLC patients, which tremendously improved survival and quality of life in some patients ( 5 ). Anti-CTLA-4 (e.g., ipilimumab) that changed the paradigm in melanoma treatment, when tested in clinical trials did not show the expected benefit in NSCLC patients ( 6 , 7 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%