2014
DOI: 10.1159/000365043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Factor 2013

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the previous 5 years [1,2,3,4,5], I am presenting my subjective selection, this time of 16 (primary) articles - actually their summaries - published in the previous year (2015) that I believe may provide some information to help the reader improve his/her clinical practice. As I noted before, the idea was originally proposed by Giovanni Fava [6] with the goal of selecting papers that I would subjectively perceive as having a high ‘Clinical Factor' - the degree and extent to which a journal article provides information to the clinician that may improve his/her practice .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the previous 5 years [1,2,3,4,5], I am presenting my subjective selection, this time of 16 (primary) articles - actually their summaries - published in the previous year (2015) that I believe may provide some information to help the reader improve his/her clinical practice. As I noted before, the idea was originally proposed by Giovanni Fava [6] with the goal of selecting papers that I would subjectively perceive as having a high ‘Clinical Factor' - the degree and extent to which a journal article provides information to the clinician that may improve his/her practice .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the previous 4 years [1,2,3,4], I am presenting my subjective selection, this time of 16 (primary) articles published in the previous year (2014) that I believe may provide some information to help the reader improve his/her clinical practice. As I noted before, the idea was originally proposed by Giovanni Fava [5] with the goal of selecting papers that I would subjectively perceive as having a high ‘clinical factor' - the degree and extent to which a journal article provides information to the clinician that may improve his/her practice .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%