2001
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200105000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Experience in the Treatment of Noma Sequelae

Abstract: We report a cohort of 148 African children operated on between 1985 and 2000 for noma sequelae. A total of 440 operations were performed. Lesions included mouth constriction in 70 of 148 cases, and severe bone destruction in 69 of 148 cases. A large proportion of children was transferred to Switzerland for surgical treatment, whereas the others were operated on in local hospitals in Africa. Vascularized calvarium flap was mostly used for bone reconstruction (n = 36). Pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our patient, antibiotics were able to control the infection even when the predisposing acute leukaemia remained undiagnosed and untreated. Most common Noma sequelae described are unilateral loss of the whole cheek, maxilla, palate and malar bone 13. The same sequelae was seen in our patient.…”
Section: Global Health Problem Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In our patient, antibiotics were able to control the infection even when the predisposing acute leukaemia remained undiagnosed and untreated. Most common Noma sequelae described are unilateral loss of the whole cheek, maxilla, palate and malar bone 13. The same sequelae was seen in our patient.…”
Section: Global Health Problem Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Further studies of postoperative distractor handling and longterm outcomes with respect to trismus are certainly required. 41 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of patient defects enables us, like other authors (Tempest, 1966;Adams-Ray and James, 1992;Pittet et al, 2001;Giessler et al, 2005), to distinguish two main reconstruction issues, in central defects with the nose and premaxilla (type II) and in lateral defects with the cheek and jaw constriction (type I and IV). The lip and especially the upper lip was almost always concerned in both reconstructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%