2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Examination of the Rotator Cuff

Abstract: Rotator cuff tears are the leading cause of shoulder pain and shoulder-related disability accounting for 4.5 million physician visits in the United States annually. A careful history and structured physical examination are often sufficient for diagnosing rotator cuff disorders. We are not aware of a clinical review article that presents a structured physical examination protocol of the rotator cuff for the interested clinician. To fill this void, we present a physical examination protocol developed on the basi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
21

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
62
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…We looked for signs of previous surgery, associated deformity, signs of previous infection, and associated ill ness, and we recorded movements around shoulder using goniometer and examined rotator cuff muscles. [17][18][19][20][21] We got ultrasound of shoulder done by senior radiologists to look for tear. X-ray of shoulder done to look for associated pathology.…”
Section: Murthy and Kamathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We looked for signs of previous surgery, associated deformity, signs of previous infection, and associated ill ness, and we recorded movements around shoulder using goniometer and examined rotator cuff muscles. [17][18][19][20][21] We got ultrasound of shoulder done by senior radiologists to look for tear. X-ray of shoulder done to look for associated pathology.…”
Section: Murthy and Kamathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cara lateral brazo Cara externa antebrazo, 1°-2° dedos 3° dedo Cara medial antebrazo, 4°-5° dedos -5° dedos puedan verse afectados a partir de la valoración sensitiva, motora y de arcos reflejos de la extremidad superior, tal como se muestra en la Para la evaluación de la estabilidad articular existen diferentes maniobras, que pueden dividirse en dos grupos: pruebas de laxitud y pruebas de inestabilidad o provocación [23,24]. Es importante esta diferenciación ya que debe recordarse que la laxitud puede ser una condición fisiológica, mientras que la inestabilidad traduce patología Revista electrónica publicada por el Departamento de Farmacología de la Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Costa Rica.…”
Section: Sensitivounclassified
“…Con una mano el examinador estabiliza la escápula del paciente, mientras con la otra traslada la cabeza humeral en dirección anterior y posterior, cuantificando el grado de desplazamiento de la cabeza humeral 23,24]. Se clasifica en grado I cuando hay translación sobre el rodete glenoideo, grado II cuando hay translación que se reduce espontáneamente, y grado III cuando hay dislocación que no se reduce de manera espontánea [21].…”
Section: Sensitivounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of upper extremity functional assessment, there are a variety of traditional clinical outcome measures that are available, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] but one of the most commonly used measure in multiple conditions may be the range of motion (ROM) evaluation because of its relative costeffectiveness and simplicity [12]. Currently, the primary measurement tool for upper extremity ROM is the manual goniometry; however, proper goniometric assessment is both time-consuming and effortintensive, with a caveat that reliability can vary depending on the experience of the evaluator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%