2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00591.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of the cleansing properties of the noninstrumental technique for cleaning root canals

Abstract: The results indicate that the noninstrumental technique for cleaning root canals needs further modifications for achieving acceptable results under clinical conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrigation alone is not always effective (29) and mechanical disinfection, related to removal of a layer of infected dentin, is required (30). Continuous irrigation and a homogenous cutting action of the SAF has been shown to lead to smear-layer free and clean canal surfaces (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigation alone is not always effective (29) and mechanical disinfection, related to removal of a layer of infected dentin, is required (30). Continuous irrigation and a homogenous cutting action of the SAF has been shown to lead to smear-layer free and clean canal surfaces (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigation alone is not always effective (27) and mechanical action of instruments on canal walls, including removal of infected dentin may be needed. In fact, a recent scanning electron microscopic study suggested that preparation with the SAF leaves very clean dentin walls, probably due to concurrent irrigation possible with this system (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been attempts to perform endodontic treatment without mechanical instrumentation by means of a vacuum device and hypochlorite perfusion of the root canal system (39). Canal cleanliness obtained with this method, however, is still unacceptable when used clinically (40), and further research is indicated to improve this interesting approach.…”
Section: Root Canal Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%