2018
DOI: 10.1089/ped.2017.0864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of Specific Immunoglobulin E in Sputum in Pediatric Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we found a highly significant correlation (rho, 0.498; p = 0.000) between total IgE levels in serum and sputum in our overall sample, a finding that is consistent with the results described by Manise et al in asthmatic patients [28]. By contrast, other authors, including Mouthuy et al [7] and Ahn et al [33] have not found any correlation between total IgE levels in sputum and serum. These contrasting findings raise further doubts about the sensitivity of the ImmunoCap technique used to measure IgE in sputum, potentially providing an additional explanation for the differences between our results and those of Mouthuy et al…”
Section: Correlation Between Ige In Sputum and Serumsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present study, we found a highly significant correlation (rho, 0.498; p = 0.000) between total IgE levels in serum and sputum in our overall sample, a finding that is consistent with the results described by Manise et al in asthmatic patients [28]. By contrast, other authors, including Mouthuy et al [7] and Ahn et al [33] have not found any correlation between total IgE levels in sputum and serum. These contrasting findings raise further doubts about the sensitivity of the ImmunoCap technique used to measure IgE in sputum, potentially providing an additional explanation for the differences between our results and those of Mouthuy et al…”
Section: Correlation Between Ige In Sputum and Serumsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The prescription of omalizumab is based on serum IgE levels which our data suggest may not be reflective of the airway inflammatory profile. Studies which have compared induced sputum levels of IgE to that of serum IgE have shown contradictory reports with some showing a correlation between the two levels, while others have shown no correlation between the two compartments [ 19 22 ]. Furthermore, studies which use more invasive measures of airway sampling would suggest that IgE levels are higher in the airways which may indicate localized production of IgE not reflected in the serum [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, both BAL and blood samples were acquired on the same day and analyzed in a similar manner to minimize potential confounders. We acknowledge that bronchoscopy may not be viable in all centers or in all patients who are being screened prior to starting monoclonal therapy; however, studies on the relationship between sputum and blood IgE have been contradictory [ 19 22 ]. Bronchoscopy offers an advantage in that it allows for visual inspection and guarantees sample acquisition to fully phenotype patients prior to starting monoclonals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We gauged responses at the fifteenth minute. We defined the positive reaction as ≥3 mm above the negative control [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained peripheral blood eosinophil counts from hemogram parameters and measured total IgE from serum (by nephelometric method with a machine from Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products, Marburg, Germany) and assayed causal or suspected food (milk, egg white, egg yolk, peanut, hazelnut, walnut, wheat, fish, soy) and aero ( Dermatophagoides farinea , Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus , Alternaria, alternata , Aspergillus , cockroaches mix, cat and dog dander, and grass-mix and tree-mix pollens) allergen-specific IgE levels with the Immuno-CAP system (UniCAP; Uppsala, Sweden) (≥0.35 kIU/L was considered to be positive). The patient’s atopy condition was described by positivity to at least one allergen by skin prick test (SPT; wheal ≥3 mm larger than negative control) or specific IgE testing (≥0.35 kIU/L) [ 20 ]. Individuals with no positive results were classified as non-atopic (non-sensitized).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%