Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: A five-year retrospective study

Vigolo, Paolo; Givani, Andrea

doi:10.1067/mpr.2000.107674

Cited by 134 publications

(160 citation statements)

References 15 publications

(20 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

132

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, the usefulness of small-diameter implants has to be discussed with an awareness of their potential limitations. Decreasing the diameter also means increasing the risk for implant fracture because of reduced mechanical stability and increasing the risk for overload [8]. As an example, lateral incisor is placed between central incisor and canine.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimum Selection of the Dental Implants according to Length and Diameter Parameters by FE Method in the Anterior Position

Arsalanloo¹,

Telchi²,

Ghaemi³

et al. 2014

IJBBB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Dental implants are used to retain and support fixed and removable dental prostheses. Over the past several decades, dental rehabilitation with implants has been widely accepted by dentists and patients because of its reliable functional and aesthetic results. In many clinical situations, local bone morphology requires dental implants that have a diameter that is significantly smaller than the typical implant diameters. In these cases, the fatigue life of the smaller diameter implants becomes a critical therapeutic parameter. According to particular situation of lateral incisor tooth, which has low space and also limited height due to the existence of the Sinus and Nerves in maxilla and mandible, respectively. Applications of various kinds of implants are being limited. This paper investigates the biomechanical behavior of a threaded dental implant/surrounding bone system under static and harmonic occlusal forces by using a three-dimensional finite element method for achieving the optimum diameter and length as the most effective parameters that are affected stress distribution in surrounding bones. The objective of this research was to select the optimum length and diameter for 26 different commercial dental implants by considering the variability in diameter and length and material of implants for missing upper/lower lateral incisor dental position by 3D finite element method. The influence of the length and diameter is considered after applying static, dynamic and fatigue loading for evaluation local/cycle failure probabilities in biodenta, CMI, DIO, implantium, and nobel implant systems. In this study, static dynamic and fatigue behaviors of the implants are investigated.Index Terms-Anterior mandible/maxilla, dental implant, finite element method, optimum diameter/length.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimum Selection of the Dental Implants according to Length and Diameter Parameters by FE Method in the Anterior Position

Arsalanloo¹,

Telchi²,

Ghaemi³

et al. 2014

IJBBB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Certains auteurs comme Vigolo [12] désignent par le terme de « mini-implant » des implants de diamètre légèrement réduit (2,9 mm). Les miniimplants Sendax MDI sont des implants endo-osseux auto-forants en alliage de titane TiAl6V4 de 1,8 mm de diamètre avec des longueurs disponibles de 10 mm, 13 mm, 15 mm et 18 mm.…”

Section: Observation Matérielunclassified

Mise en charge immédiate de mini-implants : à propos de deux cas cliniques

Bodard

Chaux-Bodard

Sauvigné

2003

Med Buccale Chir Buccale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The use of short implants (7-8.5 mm) has been associated with lower success rates (11), which were nevertheless comparable to those of implants placed in vertically augmented bone (12). In the literature, the reported survival rates for short dental implants range widely (between 88% and 100%; 2,13,14). Conversely, results from previous studies on narrow-diameter implants indicate a survival rate of between 96% and 99.4% with follow-ups of 1-5 years and irrespective of the surgical approach used (two-stage surgical approach, one-stage surgical approach, or immediate-function approach; 6,[15][16][17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Developments in surgical techniques and macro (body) and micro (surface) implant design necessitated a re-evaluation of previous results, which indicated that short implants can support most prosthetic restorations adequately (2,14) provided that a careful analysis of biomechanical risk factors is performed beforehand (13). The combination of these two characteristics (narrow diameter and short length) in one implant reflects the demand for the rehabilitation of extremely atrophic jaws with the most challenging conditions in which an implant could not otherwise be inserted without bone grafting, osteodistraction, or nerve transposition.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Retrospective cohort clinical investigation of a dental implant with a narrow diameter and short length for the partial rehabilitation of extremely atrophic jaws

Maló¹,

Nobre²,

Lopes³

et al. 2017

J Oral Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:We investigated the short-term clinical outcomes of narrow-diameter short-length implants for the fixed-prosthetic partial rehabilitation of extremely resorbed jaws. Twenty-three patients requiring partial rehabilitations with narrowplatform short-length implants in any jaw were included in this study. In total, 30 implants 3.3 mm in diameter and 7 (n = 15 implants) or 8.5 (n = 15 implants) mm in length were inserted. The primary outcome measure was implant cumulative survival rate (CSR); the secondary outcome measures were marginal bone resorption at 1 and 3 years and the incidence of biologic and mechanical complications. Five patients (21.7%) with six implants (20%) were lost to follow-up. Two implants failed in two patients, yielding a CSR at 3 years of follow-up of 93.4%. The average (standard deviation) marginal bone resorption was 1.34 mm (0.95 mm) after the first year and 1.38 mm (0.78 mm) after the third year. Biologic complications occurred in three patients; mechanical complications occurred in three patients. Despite the limitations of the study, our findings show that the use of new narrow-diameter short-length implants for the rehabilitation of extremely atrophic regions is viable in the short-term, and can be considered a treatment alternative in extremely resorbed jaws.

show abstract

Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: A five-year retrospective study

Cited by 134 publications

References 15 publications

Optimum Selection of the Dental Implants according to Length and Diameter Parameters by FE Method in the Anterior Position

Optimum Selection of the Dental Implants according to Length and Diameter Parameters by FE Method in the Anterior Position

Mise en charge immédiate de mini-implants : à propos de deux cas cliniques

Retrospective cohort clinical investigation of a dental implant with a narrow diameter and short length for the partial rehabilitation of extremely atrophic jaws

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About