2008
DOI: 10.2174/1874276900802010025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of Platelet Concentrates Either in Plasma or in Additive Solution

Abstract: Background and Objectives. Platelet concentrates (PC) obtained from Buffy-Coat (BC) may be diluted in a platelet additive solution (PAS). These PCs may reduce plasma-related adverse reactions. We have tried to assess the relationship between PAS PCs and adverse reactions. Materials and Methods. During 6 months, patients treated with intensive chemotherapy, participated in a prospective study and were randomly assigned to receive, on a prophylactic basis, PCs in either plasma or PAS-2. Five iso-group BCs were p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trying to think of how to reduce it, we realized that in our component laboratory the first event that increased activation was the implementation of a PLT additive solution (PAS) instead of plasma as storage medium for PCs. This change was not associated with clinical problems in patients; in contrast, the use of PAS‐2 (SSP, Macopharma, Tourcoing, France) resulted in fewer transfusion‐related reactions 4 . The effects on PLT metabolism and function associated with different components in PAS are only partly known, so we decided to test different ASs and compared them only in A‐PCs.…”
Section: Results Of Preparing A‐pcs With Pas‐ii Composol or Pas‐iiimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trying to think of how to reduce it, we realized that in our component laboratory the first event that increased activation was the implementation of a PLT additive solution (PAS) instead of plasma as storage medium for PCs. This change was not associated with clinical problems in patients; in contrast, the use of PAS‐2 (SSP, Macopharma, Tourcoing, France) resulted in fewer transfusion‐related reactions 4 . The effects on PLT metabolism and function associated with different components in PAS are only partly known, so we decided to test different ASs and compared them only in A‐PCs.…”
Section: Results Of Preparing A‐pcs With Pas‐ii Composol or Pas‐iiimmentioning
confidence: 99%