2011
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.021964-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of Oxoid Brilliance MRSA Agar in comparison with bioMérieux MRSA ID medium for detection of livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: Oxoid Brilliance MRSA Agar and bioMé rieux MRSA ID medium were evaluated for their ability to identify meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in clinical samples. Nasal and throat samples (n5629) were taken from veterinarians and their household members. The sensitivities of Brilliance MRSA Agar and MRSA ID medium after 20 h of incubation were 63.6 and 64.5 %, and the specificities were 94.1 and 99.4 %, respectively. After an enrichment step, the sensitivities increased to 96.3 and 97.2 %, but the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the study size limits the detection of small differences in sensitivity. The most striking finding of this study is that almost half of all MRSA isolates remained undetected when using direct culture only, an observation which confirms previous reports that broth enrichment is essential for detection of MRSA (1,(3)(4)(5).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that the study size limits the detection of small differences in sensitivity. The most striking finding of this study is that almost half of all MRSA isolates remained undetected when using direct culture only, an observation which confirms previous reports that broth enrichment is essential for detection of MRSA (1,(3)(4)(5).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Several chromogenic selective media have been developed to facilitate such screening. We previously compared the diagnostic performances of two of these media, Brilliance MRSA agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and MRSA-ID (bioMérieux, France), for the detection of MRSA in nose and throat samples taken from veterinarians and their household members (1). Although sensitivities were high and similar for both media, the specificity of the Brilliance MRSA agar (88.7%) was substantially less than that of MRSA-ID (98.5%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overnight MH broth were separately subcultured onto both chromID S. aureus and chromID MRSA agar plates. All agar plates were read after 18–24 h incubation at 35–37°C according to manufacturer's instructions [23]. All cefoxitin resistant isolates were tested using a PCR for the presence of the mec A and nuc gene [24]–[25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the targeted ESBL-E screening of clinical specimens relies on the use of selective screening agars for ESBL, several of which, with comparable high sensitivities, have been described (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). It has been shown that preenrichment using a broth improves the performance of selective screening agars for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical specimens (14)(15)(16)(17). However, the use of preenrichment for the detection of ESBL-E is still controversial (18) and is not common practice in clinical or research settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%