Clinical evaluation of multi-atlas based segmentation of lymph node regions in head and neck and prostate cancer patients

Abstract

BackgroundSemi-automated segmentation using deformable registration of selected atlas cases consisting of expert segmented patient images has been proposed to facilitate the delineation of lymph node regions for three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning of head and neck and prostate tumours. Our aim is to investigate if fusion of multiple atlases will lead to clinical workload reductions and more accurate segmentation proposals compared to the use of a single atlas segmentation, due to a more complete representation of the anatomical variations.MethodsAtlases for lymph node regions were constructed using 11 head and neck patients and 15 prostate patients based on published recommendations for segmentations. A commercial registration software (Velocity AI) was used to create individual segmentations through deformable registration. Ten head and neck patients, and ten prostate patients, all different from the atlas patients, were randomly chosen for the study from retrospective data. Each patient was first delineated three times, (a) manually by a radiation oncologist, (b) automatically using a single atlas segmentation proposal from a chosen atlas and (c) automatically by fusing the atlas proposals from all cases in the database using the probabilistic weighting fusion algorithm. In a subsequent step a radiation oncologist corrected the segmentation proposals achieved from step (b) and (c) without using the result from method (a) as reference. The time spent for editing the segmentations was recorded separately for each method and for each individual structure. Finally, the Dice Similarity Coefficient and the volume of the structures were used to evaluate the similarity between the structures delineated with the different methods.ResultsFor the single atlas method, the time reduction compared to manual segmentation was 29% and 23% for head and neck and pelvis lymph nodes, respectively, while editing the fused atlas proposal resulted in time reductions of 49% and 34%. The average volume of the fused atlas proposals was only 74% of the manual segmentation for the head and neck cases and 82% for the prostate cases due to a blurring effect from the fusion process. After editing of the proposals the resulting volume differences were no longer statistically significant, although a slight influence by the proposals could be noticed since the average edited volume was still slightly smaller than the manual segmentation, 9% and 5%, respectively.ConclusionsSegmentation based on fusion of multiple atlases reduces the time needed for delineation of lymph node regions compared to the use of a single atlas segmentation. Even though the time saving is large, the quality of the segmentation is maintained compared to manual segmentation.

Mapping Patterns of Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Nodal Metastases in Breast Cancer: Rethinking the Clinical Target Volume for High-risk Patients

“…Yet it is a retrospective study with a small sample size, examining a heterogeneous patient group including those with DM, only 60% had histological confirmation of nodal involvement, and did not discriminate between relapse and initial presentation. variations, hand-drawing may be now the most reliable default (34,35). This study, along with three others employed an alternative strategy aside from cadaver dissection in defining and shaping the CTV for SCV region for prophylactic and definitive radiation in breast cancer.…”

Comparative evaluation of autocontouring in clinical practice: A practical method using the Turing test

“…[2]. However, the different actions of initial contouring and of editing may entail the use of different tools, making a specific assessment of the impact of autocontouring more challenging. Similarly, the use of different editing tools makes it difficult to compare across studies .…”

Probabilistic liver atlas construction

“…The atlas is sometimes used to evaluate other things, commonly the quality of a segmentation like in [39, 40] or the accuracy of models of light propagation within the head [41] but the atlas itself is rarely, but occasionally [42] assessed. First, its final quality is related to the initial segmentation of the shapes used to build it and, even in manual segmentation procedures, with the protocols of organ or lesion delineation [43].…”