2014
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.17.7085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of Human Papillomavirus Detection by careHPVTMTest on Physician-Samples and Self-Samples using The Indicating FTA Elute® Card

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This update contains 19 new reports containing 22 diagnostic studies and nine new randomized participation trials, 26 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 which were added to the 34 accuracy studies and to the 16 participation trials already included in the previous meta-analyses. 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 The updated meta-analyses finally comprised 56 diagnostic test accuracy studies a...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This update contains 19 new reports containing 22 diagnostic studies and nine new randomized participation trials, 26 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 which were added to the 34 accuracy studies and to the 16 participation trials already included in the previous meta-analyses. 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 The updated meta-analyses finally comprised 56 diagnostic test accuracy studies a...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scenario of completing the self-collection at home by women themselves followed by specimens travelling would be another option for the women. Feasibility and acceptability of using dry samples versus liquid transport media have been explored previously 13 and will be further validated in the future study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for field samples the sensitivity was 89% (95% CI: 77.35-95.03) for serum, 100% (95% CI: 80-100) for lung sample and 45% (95% CI: 19.97-73.01) for oral fluids respectively. Wang et al (2014) observed higher specificity (79%) in FTA ® card as compared to liquid sample carrier (71.6%) collected from patients with human papilloma virus infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%