2010
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.109868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of hsPR3-ANCA ELISA for detection of antineutrophil cytoplasmatic antibodies directed against proteinase 3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their over the past years continuously improved performance, particularly regarding the analysis of PR3-ANCA, have questioned the usefulness of IIF for ANCA testing [24], [25], [36]. Indeed, the need to run two different assay techniques in the recommended two-tier algorithm increases the workload in an already limited in capacity autoimmune laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their over the past years continuously improved performance, particularly regarding the analysis of PR3-ANCA, have questioned the usefulness of IIF for ANCA testing [24], [25], [36]. Indeed, the need to run two different assay techniques in the recommended two-tier algorithm increases the workload in an already limited in capacity autoimmune laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PR3- and MPO-ANCA were detected using commercially available antigen-specific ELISAs according to instructions of the manufacturers (GA Generic Assays GmbH, Dahlewitz, Germany; Orgentec GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany) as described elsewhere [24], [25]. The PR3- and MPO-ANCA ELISAs of GA Generic Assays GmbH revealed intra-assay variabilities of 5.2% each and inter-assay variabilities of 6.2% each for a serum with 20.0 U/mL PR3-ANCA and 20.0 U/mL MPO-ANCA, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, a positive test result of a screening assay-has to be confirmed with a specific immunoassay. The confirmation assay has a significantly higher diagnostic specificity and a higher positive predictive value than the screening assay, but does not rule out falsepositive findings completely [35,36] . In the case of emergency situations like ANCA-associated vasculitis involving the kidneys, a maximum diagnostic confidence is needed which requires screening for C/P-ANCA via IIF on neutrophil granulocytes along with the specific determination of myeloperoxidase (MPO)-and proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA [1,4,33] .…”
Section: The Principle: Screening and Confirmationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Bei einem positiven Testergebnis mittels Screeningassay erfolgt die Bestätigung der Verdachtsdiagnose mit einem spezifischem Immunoassay. Der Bestätigungstest besitzt eine wesentlich höhere diagnostische Spezifität und einen höheren positiven prädiktiven Wert als der Suchtest, schließt jedoch falsch positive Befunde nicht aus [35,36]. In der Notfalldiagnostik bei Nierenmanifestation ANCA-assoziierter Vaskulitiden ist daher im Interesse einer höchstmöglichen diagnostischen Sicherheit das Screening auf C-/P-ANCA mittels IIF an neutrophilen Granulozyten parallel mit der spezifischen Bestimmung von Myeloperoxidase (MPO)-und Proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA gefordert [1,4,33].…”
Section: Das Prinzip: Screening Und Bestätigungunclassified