2001
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of established optimal immobilizing doses of medetomidine-ketamine in captive reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus)

Abstract: mmobilization of captive reindeer achieved by use of the optimal dose established here is clinically acceptable, although Spo2 should be carefully monitored. Administration of the optimal dose produced the same clinical effect during repeated immobilization of the same reindeer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determining an optimal dosage of an immobilization drug regimen requires the selection of quantifiable dosage-dependent parameters that can be optimized by manipulating the dosage. Induction time is important when immobilizing deer, especially free-ranging deer, because it is related to the distance that the deer may travel before becoming recumbent and thus to the incidence of injury, hyperthermia, or escape (Haigh, 1990;Ryeng et al, 2001a). Induction times have been evaluated in relation to opioid dosage in only a few cervid species (Meulemann et al, 1984;Stanley et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Determining an optimal dosage of an immobilization drug regimen requires the selection of quantifiable dosage-dependent parameters that can be optimized by manipulating the dosage. Induction time is important when immobilizing deer, especially free-ranging deer, because it is related to the distance that the deer may travel before becoming recumbent and thus to the incidence of injury, hyperthermia, or escape (Haigh, 1990;Ryeng et al, 2001a). Induction times have been evaluated in relation to opioid dosage in only a few cervid species (Meulemann et al, 1984;Stanley et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of this design include an elimination of interindividual physiologic variability, more precise identification of an optimal dosage, and the reduction in number of animals and/or immobilizations required to determine an optimal dosage. The use of this technique for opioid dosage selection has not been reported, although it has been applied to the determination of an optimal medetomidine/ketamine dosage in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus; Ryeng et al, 2001a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control animals R1 (respiratory group) and G1 (genital group) were given 1 ml of sterile water only by the same methods as described for the other animals in their respective groups. After the inoculations, immobilization was reversed by intramuscular administration of atipamezole (Antisedan; Orion Corporation, Turku Finland) (5 mg per mg of previously administered medetomidine) (30).…”
Section: Cells and Virus Madin-darby Bovine Kidney Cells ([Mdbk] Atcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arnemo and Aanes (2009) did a similar study on medetomidine-ketamine anesthesia in Svalbard reindeer (SR, Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus). Hypoxemia (as indicated by pulse oximetry) following medetomidine-ketamine administration has also been reported for captive, semidomestic Norwegian reindeer, R. t. tarandus (Ryeng et al, 2001), WR (Arnemo et al, 2011), and SR (Arnemo and Aanes, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The Svalbard reindeer were calm and not concerned by the darter's presence and often walked only 10-20 m away when they noticed the presence of the researchers. The SR exhibited lower and the WR higher temperatures than found in captive semidomestic reindeer (mean 39.1 C, 95% CI, 38.9-39.3 C; Ryeng et al, 2001), likely indicating relative stress levels for captures in these three types of reindeer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%