2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2017.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics

Abstract: Ebola virus disease (EVD) was first described over 40 years ago, but no treatment has been approved for humans. The 2013–2016 EVD outbreak in West Africa has expedited the clinical evaluation of several candidate therapeutics that act through different mechanisms, but with mixed results. Nevertheless, these studies are important because the accumulation of clinical data and valuable experience in conducting efficacy trials under emergency circumstances will lead to better implementation of similar studies in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the 2014‐2016 outbreak highlighted several therapeutic compounds that successfully crossed Phase I clinical trials, some of them indicated safety concerns . The clinical trials conducted during the outbreak lacked proper controls and statistical power due to the severity and urgency of the disease .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the 2014‐2016 outbreak highlighted several therapeutic compounds that successfully crossed Phase I clinical trials, some of them indicated safety concerns . The clinical trials conducted during the outbreak lacked proper controls and statistical power due to the severity and urgency of the disease .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is worsened by the high level of biocontainment (BSL-4) necessary for the manipulation of this virus that considerably hampers the development of antiviral drugs and vaccines. In this context, DR studies were prompted by the last outbreak (extensively reviewed in [30][31][32]). EBOV provides a unique example of a DR approach applied directly in clinical trials, as during the last outbreak several drugs were evaluated in infected patients (under both clinical trials and compassionate use) to test their ability to protect from lethal EBOV infection.…”
Section: Drug Repurposing For Rna Virus Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBOV provides a unique example of a DR approach applied directly in clinical trials, as during the last outbreak several drugs were evaluated in infected patients (under both clinical trials and compassionate use) to test their ability to protect from lethal EBOV infection. These included the viral RNA polymerase inhibitors favipiravir (approved in Japan for the treatment of influenza A virus) [31,33], GS-5734 (an adenosine analog active against highly pathogenic coronaviruses) [34,35], and amodiaquine (an antimalarial drug widely used in Africa). Treatment of EBOV-infected patients with these drugs has been associated with a decrease in fatality rate compared to control patients [30]; however, their efficacy remains to be confirmed in randomized clinical studies.…”
Section: Drug Repurposing For Rna Virus Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent and ongoing EBOV outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) at the time of this writing, including the EBOV Ituri outbreak affecting over 3,000 individuals (CFR = 66%), emphasize the need for continued developments of therapeutics and vaccines [ 30 ]. The rVSV-EBOV-GP vaccine, which demonstrated great efficacy in nonhuman primates (NHPs) and humans [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], was approved in December 2019 after several phase III clinical and ring-vaccination trials demonstrated 100% protection in the absence of severe adverse events in over 10,000 individuals [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Additionally, over 200,000 doses were administered as part of compassionate use prior to FDA approval due to high efficacy and the 2018 outbreak in the DRC and Uganda ( Table 1 ) [ 43 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%