2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-006-0292-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of chemosensitivity testing for patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug sensitivity test (CD-DST)

Abstract: The results show that CD-DST is capable of selecting the responders and the respective optimal regimens, and also delineating the patients less likely benefit from treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro chemosensitivity was examined using the collagen gel-droplet embedded culture drug sensitivity test (cD-Dst), as previously described by kobayashi et al, with minor modifications (10)(11)(12)(13). Briefly, surgically resected specimens were finely minced using a scalpel and digested in a cell dispersion enzyme solution ez (nitta gelatin inc.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro chemosensitivity was examined using the collagen gel-droplet embedded culture drug sensitivity test (cD-Dst), as previously described by kobayashi et al, with minor modifications (10)(11)(12)(13). Briefly, surgically resected specimens were finely minced using a scalpel and digested in a cell dispersion enzyme solution ez (nitta gelatin inc.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro chemosensitivity was examined using the collagen gel-droplet embedded culture drug sensitivity test (CD-DST) method, as described by kobayashi et al (12,13) and kawamura et al (14), with minor modifications. Briefly, surgically resected specimens were finely minced using a scalpel and digested in cell dispersion enzyme solution Ez (Nitta Gelatin Inc.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity rates of the patients to chemotherapeutic agents varied from 8.8% to 88.2%, and from highest to lowest was: NDP, CDDP, GEM, VNR, 5-Fu, Pemetrexed, DOC and BLM. This result demonstrates that the response of each patient to chemotherapeutic agents was different due to its heterogeneity, which has been reported by Kawamura M et al (2007). Individualized chemotherapy based on chemosensitivity test is urgently advocated in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The whole plate was cultured for -mean OD blank controls )/(OD control groups -OD blank controls )] ×100. The inhibition rate of 50% or more was considered as being sensitive to the individual chemotherapeutic agent in vitro (Kawamura et al, 2007;Higashiyama et al, 2010;Higashiyama et al, 2012), and the sensitivity rate of each patient to chemotherapeutic agents was calculated as follows: Sensitivity rate (%) = (number of chemosensitive cases/number of evaluated cases) ×100.…”
Section: Cell Isolation and Mts Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%